These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12188522)

  • 1. Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking.
    De Houwer J; Beckers T; Glautier S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):965-85. PubMed ID: 12188522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial separation of target and competitor cues enhances blocking of human causality judgements.
    Glautier S
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Apr; 55(2):121-35. PubMed ID: 12075979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forward blocking in human learning sometimes reflects the failure to encode a cue-outcome relationship.
    Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF; Minard E; Lavis Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):830-44. PubMed ID: 16608749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements.
    Dickinson A; Burke J
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1996 Feb; 49(1):60-80. PubMed ID: 8901386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome additivity, elemental processing and blocking in human causality judgements.
    Livesey EJ; Boakes RA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Oct; 57(4):361-79. PubMed ID: 15513261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure.
    Vadillo MA; Matute H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 17366310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative effect of cue interaction.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Aug; 56(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 12881163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When one cue is not enough: combining fast and frugal heuristics with compound cue processing.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Hoffrage U; Dieckmann A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1197-215. PubMed ID: 17676553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cue-interaction effects in contingency judgments using the streamed-trial procedure.
    Hannah SD; Crump MJ; Allan LG; Siegel S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Jun; 63(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 19485601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning about cues that prevent an outcome: conditioned inhibition and differential inhibition in human predictive learning.
    Karazinov DM; Boakes RA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Apr; 57(2):153-78. PubMed ID: 15204114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Backward blocking: the role of within-compound associations and interference between cues trained apart.
    Vadillo MA; Castro L; Matute H; Wasserman EA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 17886193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Backward and forward blocking in human electrodermal conditioning: blocking requires an assumption of outcome additivity.
    Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Oct; 55(4):311-29. PubMed ID: 12350284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Large effects of peripheral cues on appearance correlate with low precision.
    Kerzel D; Zarian L; Gauch A; Buetti S
    J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(11):26. PubMed ID: 20884521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The basic laws of conditioning differ for elemental cues and cues trained in compound.
    Urushihara K; Stout SC; Miller RR
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Apr; 15(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 15043646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive and negative mediation as a function of whether the absent cue was previously associated with the outcome.
    Castro L; Matute H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2359-75. PubMed ID: 20603776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating three criteria for establishing cue-search hierarchies in inferential judgment.
    Rakow T; Newell BR; Fayers K; Hersby M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):1088-104. PubMed ID: 16248752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.