These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12188547)

  • 41. Comparison of two-stage thermophilic (68 degrees C/55 degrees C) anaerobic digestion with one-stage thermophilic (55 degrees C) digestion of cattle manure.
    Nielsen HB; Mladenovska Z; Westermann P; Ahring BK
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 May; 86(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 15083509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Integrated biological and electro-chemical treatment of swine manure.
    Chae KJ; Yim SK; Choi KH; Kim SK; Park WK
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):427-34. PubMed ID: 15137454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dry-thermophilic anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of the municipal solid waste: focusing on the inoculum sources.
    Forster-Carneiro T; Pérez M; Romero LI; Sales D
    Bioresour Technol; 2007 Dec; 98(17):3195-203. PubMed ID: 16919940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Phenols in anaerobic digestion processes and inhibition of ammonia oxidising bacteria (AOB) in soil.
    Levén L; Nyberg K; Korkea-Aho L; Schnürer A
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jul; 364(1-3):229-38. PubMed ID: 16125214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Continuous biogas production from fodder beet silage as sole substrate.
    Scherer PA; Dobler S; Rohardt S; Loock R; Büttner B; Nöldeke P; Brettschuh A
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 14531447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Potential of low-temperature anaerobic digestion to address current environmental concerns on swine production.
    Massé DI; Masse L; Xia Y; Gilbert Y
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Apr; 88(13 Suppl):E112-20. PubMed ID: 19855002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of UASB and EGSB reactors performance, for treatment of raw and deoiled palm oil mill effluent (POME).
    Fang C; O-Thong S; Boe K; Angelidaki I
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 May; 189(1-2):229-34. PubMed ID: 21377272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Anaerobic biotransformation and methane generation potential of cheese whey in batch and UASB reactors.
    Ergüder TH; Tezel U; Güven E; Demirer GN
    Waste Manag; 2001; 21(7):643-50. PubMed ID: 11530920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Simultaneous toxicity and nutrient removals in simulated DEPHANOX (anaerobic/anoxic/oxic sequentials) process treating dinitrotoluene and trichlorotoluene.
    Sponza DT; Atalay H
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):237-44. PubMed ID: 15137429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Improvement of COD and color removal from UASB treated poultry manure wastewater using Fenton's oxidation.
    Yetilmezsoy K; Sakar S
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Mar; 151(2-3):547-58. PubMed ID: 17643817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of process stability on anaerobic biodegradation of LAS in UASB reactors.
    Løbner T; Toräng L; Batstone DJ; Schmidt JE; Angelidaki I
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Mar; 89(7):759-65. PubMed ID: 15696511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Study of the operational conditions for anaerobic digestion of urban solid wastes.
    M EF; Cristancho DE; Arellano AV
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(5):546-56. PubMed ID: 16321515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Performance and kinetic evaluation of the anaerobic digestion of two-phase olive mill effluents in reactors with suspended and immobilized biomass.
    Raposo F; Borja R; Sánchez E; Martín MA; Martín A
    Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(8):2017-26. PubMed ID: 15087182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Anaerobic co-digestion of table olive debittering & washing effluent, cattle manure and pig manure in batch and high volume laboratory anaerobic digesters: effect of temperature.
    Zarkadas IS; Pilidis GA
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(8):4995-5003. PubMed ID: 21334877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Anaerobic biodegradation of aircraft deicing fluid in UASB reactors.
    Tham PT; Kennedy KJ
    Water Res; 2004 May; 38(10):2515-28. PubMed ID: 15159155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Stimulation of methanol degradation in UASB reactors: in situ versus pre-loading cobalt on anaerobic granular sludge.
    Zandvoort MH; Gieteling J; Lettinga G; Lens PN
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 Sep; 87(7):897-904. PubMed ID: 15334416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect and fate of antibiotics during the anaerobic digestion of pig manure.
    Alvarez JA; Otero L; Lema JM; Omil F
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Nov; 101(22):8581-6. PubMed ID: 20621471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Development of a new type of anaerobic digestion process equipped with the function of nitrogen removal.
    Noike T; Goo IS; Matsumoto H; Miyahara T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):173-9. PubMed ID: 15137421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A side-by-side comparison of two systems of sequencing coupled reactors for anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste.
    Poggi-Varaldo HM; Alzate-Gaviria LM; Pérez-Hernández A; Nevarez-Morillón VG; Rinderknecht-Seijas N
    Waste Manag Res; 2005 Jun; 23(3):270-80. PubMed ID: 15988946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Anaerobic sewage treatment in a one-stage UASB reactor and a combined UASB-Digester system.
    Mahmoud N; Zeeman G; Gijzen H; Lettinga G
    Water Res; 2004 May; 38(9):2347-57. PubMed ID: 15142796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.