136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12189085)
1. Ethical evaluation of heroin-prescription research: an insider's view.
Sprumont D
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 12189085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Who holds the leash?
Elliott C
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):48. PubMed ID: 12189076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cynthia's Dilemma.
Ling W
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 12189080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Unsafe presumptions in clinical research.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 12189077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A "fix" of reality.
Katz D; Neuberger JR
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):56-7. PubMed ID: 12189081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Authenticity and the hijacked brain.
McLeod C
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):62-3. PubMed ID: 12189084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethics and heroin prescription: no more fuzzy goals!
Orr AS; Wynia MK
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):52-3. PubMed ID: 12189079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Addiction and consent.
Roberts LW
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):58-60. PubMed ID: 12189082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Resisting the temptations of addiction rhetoric.
Perring C
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):51-2. PubMed ID: 12189078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Choice, rationality, and substance dependence.
Freckelton I
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 12189083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cynthia's dilemma: consenting to heroin prescription.
Charland LC
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):37-47. PubMed ID: 12189075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Addiction, autonomy and ego-depletion: a response to Bennett Foddy and Julian Savulescu.
Levy N
Bioethics; 2006 Feb; 20(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 16680878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Research involving cognitively impaired adults.
Karlawish JH
N Engl J Med; 2003 Apr; 348(14):1389-92. PubMed ID: 12672869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Addiction and autonomy: can addicted people consent to the prescription of their drug of addiction?
Foddy B; Savulescu J
Bioethics; 2006 Feb; 20(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 16680876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cynthia'a dilemma.
O'Brien CP
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 12442758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Planning for future research participation: ethical and practical considerations.
Dresser R
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):129-36. PubMed ID: 11658171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protection of research subjects.
Bateman BT; Meyers PM
N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(2):188-92; author reply 188-92. PubMed ID: 12856646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Patients' competence to consent to neurobiological research.
Appelbaum PS
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):241-51. PubMed ID: 11654519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What do people at risk for Alzheimer disease think about surrogate consent for research?
Schenk DB; Gilman S
Neurology; 2006 Jun; 66(11):1785-6. PubMed ID: 16769971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent with cognitively impaired patients: an NIMH perspective on the durable power of attorney.
Sunderland T; Dukoff R
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):217-26. PubMed ID: 11654517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
