These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12190079)

  • 1. Are we there yet? The representation of women as subjects in clinical research.
    Stewart DE; Cheung AM; Layne D; Evis M
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 2000 Jun; 33(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 12190079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women subjects in NIH-funded clinical research literature: lack of progress in both representation and analysis by sex.
    Vidaver RM; Lafleur B; Tong C; Bradshaw R; Marts SA
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2000 Jun; 9(5):495-504. PubMed ID: 10883941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Women in clinical trials: an FDA perspective.
    Sherman LA; Temple R; Merkatz RB
    Science; 1995 Aug; 269(5225):793-5. PubMed ID: 7638593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The inclusion of women in clinical trials.
    Meinert CL
    Science; 1995 Aug; 269(5225):795-6. PubMed ID: 7638594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. There is no women's health crisis.
    Satel SL
    Public Interest; 1998; 130():21-33. PubMed ID: 11658109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inclusion of women in clinical research.
    Dubois MY; Burris JF
    Acad Med; 1994 Sep; 69(9):693-4. PubMed ID: 8074756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Women and health research: working for change.
    Baylis F
    J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 8981194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recruitment of women into trials.
    Thornton H; Dixon-Woods M
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9301):164-5. PubMed ID: 11809284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Volunteering for research.
    Collier J
    Lancet; 1992 Oct; 340(8827):1103. PubMed ID: 1357497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A reappraisal of female adolescent participation in drug clinical trials.
    VandenBosch TM; Ward BG; Mattison D
    IRB; 1999; 21(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11657965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recruitment of women into trials.
    Bartlett EE
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9301):165. PubMed ID: 11809282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Representation of women in randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular disease prevention.
    Melloni C; Berger JS; Wang TY; Gunes F; Stebbins A; Pieper KS; Dolor RJ; Douglas PS; Mark DB; Newby LK
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2010 Mar; 3(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 20160159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Women of childbearing potential in clinical research: perspectives on NIH policy and liability issues.
    Hayunga EG; Rothenberg KH; Pinn VW
    Food Drug Cosmet Med Device Law Dig; 1996 Jan; 13(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 11660302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guidelines for the design and conduct of AIDS clinical trials. AIDS Clinical Trials Group.
    Cotton DJ; Powderly WG; Feinberg J; Abrams DI; Chaisson RE; Wheat LJ; Finkelstein DM; Tallman V; Zimmer B; Berzon R
    Clin Infect Dis; 1993 Jun; 16(6):816-22; discussion 823-4. PubMed ID: 8329514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. We've come a long way, maybe: recruitment of women and analysis of results by sex in clinical research.
    Marrocco A; Stewart DE
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2001 Mar; 10(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 11268300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The exclusion of the elderly and women from clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction.
    Gurwitz JH; Col NF; Avorn J
    JAMA; 1992 Sep; 268(11):1417-22. PubMed ID: 1512909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A drug company report: what is the same and what is changing with respect to inclusion/exclusion of women in clinical trials.
    Goldmann BJ
    Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 11653139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating sex differences in medical device clinical trials: time for action.
    Dhruva SS; Redberg RF
    JAMA; 2012 Mar; 307(11):1145-6. PubMed ID: 22378695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The IRB's role in assessing the generalizability of non-NIH-funded clinical trials.
    Weijer C
    IRB; 1998; 20(2-3):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guinea pigs on the payroll: the ethics of paying research subjects.
    Lemmens T; Elliott C
    Account Res; 1999; 7(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 11657561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.