These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12190263)

  • 1. Cross-language computational investigation of the length effect in reading aloud.
    Perry C; Ziegler JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Aug; 28(4):990-1001. PubMed ID: 12190263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages?
    Hutzler F; Ziegler JC; Perry C; Wimmer H; Zorzi M
    Cognition; 2004 Apr; 91(3):273-96. PubMed ID: 15168898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serial processing in reading aloud: no challenge for a parallel model.
    Zorzi M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):847-56. PubMed ID: 10811180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Additivity of factor effects in reading tasks is still a challenge for computational models: Reply to Ziegler, Perry, and Zorzi (2009).
    Besner D; O'Malley S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):312-6. PubMed ID: 19210105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: simulating individual differences and subtypes.
    Ziegler JC; Castel C; Pech-Georgel C; George F; Alario FX; Perry C
    Cognition; 2008 Apr; 107(1):151-78. PubMed ID: 17959161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phonological dyslexia and phonological impairment: an exception to the rule?
    Tree JJ; Kay J
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(14):2861-73. PubMed ID: 16879843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud.
    Perry C; Ziegler JC; Zorzi M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Apr; 114(2):273-315. PubMed ID: 17500628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A dual-route cascaded model of reading by deaf adults: evidence for grapheme to viseme conversion.
    Elliott EA; Braun M; Kuhlmann M; Jacobs AM
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 22159409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model.
    Perry C; Ziegler JC; Zorzi M
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Sep; 61(2):106-51. PubMed ID: 20510406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computational modeling of reading in semantic dementia: comment on Woollams, Lambon Ralph, Plaut, and Patterson (2007).
    Coltheart M; Tree JJ; Saunders SJ
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jan; 117(1):256-71; discussion 271-2. PubMed ID: 20063972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the orthographic/phonological onset a single unit in reading aloud?
    Mousikou P; Coltheart M; Saunders S; Yen L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):175-94. PubMed ID: 20121303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can the dual-route cascaded computational model of reading offer a valid account of the masked onset priming effect?
    Mousikou P; Coltheart M; Finkbeiner M; Saunders S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):984-1003. PubMed ID: 19742386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Zeading and reazing: which is faster? The position of the diverging letter in a pseudoword determines reading time.
    Mulatti C; Peressotti F; Job R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jul; 60(7):1005-14. PubMed ID: 17616916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do dual-route models accurately predict reading and spelling performance in individuals with acquired alexia and agraphia?
    Rapcsak SZ; Henry ML; Teague SL; Carnahan SD; Beeson PM
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(11):2519-24. PubMed ID: 17482218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of overreliance on an "outlier" orthography.
    Share DL
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):584-615. PubMed ID: 18605821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When parallel processing in visual word recognition is not enough: new evidence from naming.
    Roberts MA; Rastle K; Coltheart M; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Jun; 10(2):405-14. PubMed ID: 12921417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A computational and empirical investigation of graphemes in reading.
    Perry C; Ziegler JC; Zorzi M
    Cogn Sci; 2013 Jul; 37(5):800-28. PubMed ID: 23489148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational modelling of phonological dyslexia: how does the DRC model fare?
    Nickels L; Biedermann B; Coltheart M; Saunders S; Tree JJ
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Mar; 25(2):165-93. PubMed ID: 18568812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Serial processing in reading aloud: reply to Zorzi (2000).
    Rastle K; Coltheart M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Jun; 26(3):1232-5. PubMed ID: 10884020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cross-script length effect: further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud.
    Rastle K; Havelka J; Wydell TN; Coltheart M; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19210093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.