BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12190297)

  • 1. Statistics in the pathology laboratory: diagnostic test interpretation.
    Empson MB
    Pathology; 2002 Aug; 34(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 12190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistics on microcomputers: a non-algebraic guide to the appropriate use of statistical packages in biomedical research and pathology laboratory practice. 6. Statistical methods for diagnostic tests.
    Brown RA; Beck JS
    J Clin Pathol; 1989 Mar; 42(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 2649517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretative comments and reference ranges in EQA programs as a tool for improving laboratory appropriateness and effectiveness.
    Sciacovelli L; Zardo L; Secchiero S; Zaninotto M; Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2003 Jul; 333(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 12849907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpreting diagnostic tests with continuous results and no gold standard: a common scenario explained using the tuberculin skin test.
    Dobler CC; Murad MH
    Evid Based Med; 2017 Dec; 22(6):199-201. PubMed ID: 29056603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpretation of statistics in clinical laboratory studies.
    Kay LW; Gebert MA
    Clin Lab Sci; 2006; 19(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 16617554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The interpretation of diagnostic tests.
    Shapiro DE
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1999 Jun; 8(2):113-34. PubMed ID: 10501649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The interpretation of diagnostic test: a primer for physiotherapists.
    Davidson M
    Aust J Physiother; 2002; 48(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 12217073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalized likelihood ratios for quantitative diagnostic test scores.
    Tandberg D; Deely JJ; O'Malley AJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 1997 Nov; 15(7):694-9. PubMed ID: 9375556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Critical appraisal of evidence on diagnostic tests].
    Furukawa T
    Rinsho Byori; 2003 Jan; 51(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12652687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Statistical control of the quality of clinical laboratory analyses (a lecture)].
    Balakhovskiĭ IS
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2009 Oct; (10):30-7. PubMed ID: 20000112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advances in statistical methodology for the evaluation of diagnostic and laboratory tests.
    Campbell G
    Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):499-508. PubMed ID: 8023031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of likelihood ratios improves interpretation of laboratory testing for pulmonary sarcoidosis.
    De Smet D; Martens GA; Berghe BV; Meysman M; Heylen O; Gorus FK; De Waele M
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Dec; 134(6):939-47. PubMed ID: 21088158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The likelihood ratio: estimation of the impact of a diagnostic test on treatment decision].
    Kluth LA; Rink M; Chun FK; Fisch M; Shariat SF; Dahm P
    Urologe A; 2013 Jul; 52(7):982-5. PubMed ID: 23708004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A two-stage estimation for screening studies using two diagnostic tests with binary disease status verified in test positives only.
    Li F; Chu H; Nie L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):635-56. PubMed ID: 21920876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An interpretation of normal ranges based on a new concept "individual difference quotient" of clinical laboratory data.
    Tango T
    Med Inform (Lond); 1981; 6(3):161-74. PubMed ID: 7289681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Apr; 96(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 17306009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 'Likelihood-ratio' and 'odds' applied to monitoring of patients as a supplement to 'reference change value' (RCV).
    Petersen PH; Sandberg S; Iglesias N; Sölétormos G; Aarsand AK; Brandslund I; Jørgensen LG
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 18076354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The rank correlation coefficient: an additional aid in the interpretation of laboratory data.
    Estelberger W; Reibnegger G
    Clin Chim Acta; 1995 Aug; 239(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 8542659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Roaming through methodology. XXXVI. Likelihood ratios and Bayes' rule].
    Vermeulen M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(50):2421-4. PubMed ID: 11776667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The two-step Fagan's nomogram: ad hoc interpretation of a diagnostic test result without calculation.
    Caraguel CG; Vanderstichel R
    Evid Based Med; 2013 Aug; 18(4):125-8. PubMed ID: 23468201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.