These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12190803)

  • 1. Design evaluation of commonly used rigid and levering laryngoscope blades.
    Yardeni IZ; Gefen A; Smolyarenko V; Zeidel A; Beilin B
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2002 Sep; 46(8):1003-9. PubMed ID: 12190803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison between the Macintosh and the McCoy laryngoscope blades.
    Cook TM; Tuckey JP
    Anaesthesia; 1996 Oct; 51(10):977-80. PubMed ID: 8984878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An analysis of laryngoscope blade shape and design: new criteria for laryngoscope evaluation.
    Marks RR; Hancock R; Charters P
    Can J Anaesth; 1993 Mar; 40(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 8467549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. View of the larynx obtained using the Miller blade and paraglossal approach, compared to that with the Macintosh blade.
    Achen B; Terblanche OC; Finucane BT
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2008 Sep; 36(5):717-21. PubMed ID: 18853593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical comparison of the Flexiblade and Macintosh laryngoscopes for laryngeal exposure in anesthetized adults.
    Cheung RW; Irwin MG; Law BC; Chan CK
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):626-30. PubMed ID: 16428574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Flexiblade levering laryngoscope with the English Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a poor laryngoscopic view.
    Beilin B; Yardeni IZ; Smolyarenko V; Zeidel A; Ram E; Mayburd E
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Apr; 60(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 15766344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Cardiff paediatric laryngoscope blade: a comparison with the Miller size 1 and Macintosh size 2 laryngoscope blades.
    Jones RM; Jones PL; Gildersleve CD; Hall JE; Harding LJ; Chawathe MS
    Anaesthesia; 2004 Oct; 59(10):1016-9. PubMed ID: 15488063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the laryngoscopy views with the size 1 Miller and Macintosh laryngoscope blades lifting the epiglottis or the base of the tongue in infants and children <2 yr of age.
    Passi Y; Sathyamoorthy M; Lerman J; Heard C; Marino M
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Nov; 113(5):869-74. PubMed ID: 25062740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Straight blades improve visualization of the larynx while curved blades increase ease of intubation: a comparison of the Macintosh, Miller, McCoy, Belscope and Lee-Fiberview blades.
    Arino JJ; Velasco JM; Gasco C; Lopez-Timoneda F
    Can J Anaesth; 2003 May; 50(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 12734161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the Miller blade truly provide a better laryngoscopic view and intubating conditions than the Macintosh blade in small children?
    Varghese E; Kundu R
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Aug; 24(8):825-9. PubMed ID: 24690084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of paraglossal straight blade laryngoscopy in difficult tracheal intubation.
    Henderson JJ
    Anaesthesia; 1997 Jun; 52(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 9203882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of the Macintosh curved blade size on direct laryngoscopic view in edentulous patients.
    Kim H; Chang JE; Han SH; Lee JM; Yoon S; Hwang JY
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):120-123. PubMed ID: 28974373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lower flange modification improves performance of the Macintosh, but not the Miller laryngoscope blade.
    Kimberger O; Fischer L; Plank C; Mayer N
    Can J Anaesth; 2006 Jun; 53(6):595-601. PubMed ID: 16738295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy with the Bullard, Macintosh, and Miller laryngoscopes.
    Hastings RH; Vigil AC; Hanna R; Yang BY; Sartoris DJ
    Anesthesiology; 1995 Apr; 82(4):859-69. PubMed ID: 7717556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two Macintosh laryngoscope blades in 300 patients.
    Asai T; Matsumoto S; Fujise K; Johmura S; Shingu K
    Br J Anaesth; 2003 Apr; 90(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 12644417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The McCoy levering laryngoscope in patients with limited neck extension.
    Uchida T; Hikawa Y; Saito Y; Yasuda K
    Can J Anaesth; 1997 Jun; 44(6):674-6. PubMed ID: 9187791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The McCoy straight blade does not improve laryngoscopy and intubation in normal infants.
    Iohom G; Franklin R; Casey W; Lyons B
    Can J Anaesth; 2004 Feb; 51(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 14766692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The levering laryngoscope.
    McCoy EP; Mirakhur RK
    Anaesthesia; 1993 Jun; 48(6):516-9. PubMed ID: 8292132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new mirrored laryngoscope.
    McMorrow RC; Mirakhur RK
    Anaesthesia; 2003 Oct; 58(10):998-1002. PubMed ID: 12969041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glottic views using a Miller size 0 blade are superior to those from a Macintosh size 0 blade in neonates: a randomized trial.
    Saracoglu A; Lerman J; Kafali H; Canaz H; T Saracoglu K
    Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2021; 53(3):246-251. PubMed ID: 35164484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.