These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12190912)

  • 1. In vitro comparison of root-canal measurements with conventional and digital radiology.
    Lozano A; Forner L; Llena C
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):542-50. PubMed ID: 12190912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison between conventional and digital radiography in root canal working length determination.
    Farida A; Maryam E; Ali M; Ehsan M; Sajad Y; Soraya K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 23965452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film.
    Cederberg RA; Tidwell E; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Mar; 85(3):325-8. PubMed ID: 9540092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of the distance between the minor foramen and the anatomic apex by digital and conventional radiography.
    Melius B; Jiang J; Zhu Q
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11833685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro comparison of root canal measurement in primary teeth.
    Subramaniam P; Konde S; Mandanna DK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2005 Sep; 23(3):124-5. PubMed ID: 16224130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of working length determination using apex locator, conventional radiography and radiovisiography: an in vitro study.
    Kishor KM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):550-3. PubMed ID: 23151708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
    Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
    Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of a new apex locator: an in vitro study.
    Kaufman AY; Keila S; Yoshpe M
    Int Endod J; 2002 Feb; 35(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 11843975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ex vivo comparison of radiographic and electronic root canal length measurements in primary molars.
    Topaloglu-Ak A; Aykut Yetkiner A; Güniz Baksi B; Eronat C
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Jun; 16(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 26147823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological considerations in the determination of working length.
    Martínez-Lozano MA; Forner-Navarro L; Sánchez-Cortés JL; Llena-Puy C
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jul; 34(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 11482720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro comparison of 10 radiographic methods for working length estimation.
    Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K; Czajka J
    Int Endod J; 1995 May; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 8626199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An ex vivo comparison of conventional and digital radiography for perceived image quality of root fillings.
    Akdeniz BG; Soğur E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):397-401. PubMed ID: 15910475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of E-speed film for root canal length determination.
    Powell-Cullingford AW; Pitt Ford TR
    Int Endod J; 1993 Sep; 26(5):268-72. PubMed ID: 8300258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of radiovisiography with radiographic film in root length determination.
    Ong EY; Pitt Ford TR
    Int Endod J; 1995 Jan; 28(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 7642325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vivo comparative evaluation to determine the accuracy of working length between radiographic and electronic apex locators.
    Singh SV; Nikhil V; Singh AV; Yadav S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 23059573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans in comparison with periapical radiographs for root canal length measurement: an in situ study.
    Metska ME; Liem VM; Parsa A; Koolstra JH; Wesselink PR; Ozok AR
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1206-9. PubMed ID: 25069934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Root canal length determination by different methods in primary teeth: an in vivo study.
    Wankhade AD; Kumar R; Singh RK; Chandra A
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(2):E38-42. PubMed ID: 23635968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals.
    Burger CL; Mork TO; Hutter JW; Nicoll B
    J Endod; 1999 Apr; 25(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 10425952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gray scale inversion in digital image for measurement of tooth length.
    Oliveira ML; Vieira ML; Cruz AD; Bóscolo FN; DE Almeida SM
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):703-6. PubMed ID: 23338264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.