These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12190912)

  • 21. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. II. In vivo evaluation.
    Ellingsen MA; Hollender LG; Harrington GW
    J Endod; 1995 Oct; 21(10):516-20. PubMed ID: 8596074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography.
    Mentes A; Gencoglu N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jan; 93(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 11805781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination.
    Kqiku L; Städtler P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):777-80. PubMed ID: 22484869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Imaging of root canal fillings: a comparison of subjective image quality between limited cone-beam CT, storage phosphor and film radiography.
    Soğur E; Baksi BG; Gröndahl HG
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 17305694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of a digital measurement tool to estimate working length in endodontics.
    Lamus F; Katz JO; Glaros AG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2001 Feb; 2(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12167941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Radiovisiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
    Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Oct; 21(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 2082410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of radiographic and electronical working length determination on palatal and mesio-buccal root canals of extracted upper molars.
    Krajczár K; Marada G; Gyulai G; Tóth V
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):e90-3. PubMed ID: 18554958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ex vivo performance of five methods for root canal length determination in primary anterior teeth.
    Mello-Moura AC; Moura-Netto C; Araki AT; Guedes-Pinto AC; Mendes FM
    Int Endod J; 2010 Feb; 43(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 20078703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of digitally scanned radiographs with conventional film for the detection of small endodontic instruments.
    Fuge KN; Stuck AM; Love RM
    Int Endod J; 1998 Mar; 31(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 9868939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Hedrick RT; Dove SB; Peters DD; McDavid WD
    J Endod; 1994 Jul; 20(7):320-6. PubMed ID: 7996092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vitro comparative study of conventional radiography and Root ZX apex locator in determining root canal working length.
    Javidi M; Moradi S; Rashed R; Raziee L
    N Y State Dent J; 2009; 75(4):48-51. PubMed ID: 19722483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation.
    Ellingsen MA; Harrington GW; Hollender LG
    J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):326-31. PubMed ID: 7673842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of digital radiography and apex locator with the conventional method in root length determination of primary teeth.
    Neena IE; Ananthraj A; Praveen P; Karthik V; Rani P
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011; 29(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 22016313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Endodontic measurements in digital radiographs acquired by a photostimulable, storage phosphor system.
    Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1996 Feb; 12(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8631285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography.
    Leddy BJ; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):542-5. PubMed ID: 7643038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of phosphor-plate digital images with conventional radiographs for the perceived clarity of fine endodontic files and periapical lesions.
    Friedlander LT; Love RM; Chandler NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Mar; 93(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 11925542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
    Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [In vitro comparison of an electronic root canal length measuring device and the radiographic determination of working length].
    Pommer O
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2001; 111(10):1165-70. PubMed ID: 11729819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.