These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12191855)

  • 41. Evaluating legacy contaminants and emerging chemicals in marine environments using adverse outcome pathways and biological effects-directed analysis.
    Hutchinson TH; Lyons BP; Thain JE; Law RJ
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Sep; 74(2):517-25. PubMed ID: 23820191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Should the scope of human mixture risk assessment span legislative/regulatory silos for chemicals?
    Evans RM; Martin OV; Faust M; Kortenkamp A
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Feb; 543(Pt A):757-764. PubMed ID: 26573369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Differences in individual susceptibility to toxic effects of chemicals determine the dose-response relationship and consequences of setting exposure standards.
    Lutz WK
    Toxicol Lett; 2002 Feb; 126(3):155-8. PubMed ID: 11814700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Environmental and chemical carcinogenesis.
    Wogan GN; Hecht SS; Felton JS; Conney AH; Loeb LA
    Semin Cancer Biol; 2004 Dec; 14(6):473-86. PubMed ID: 15489140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Developmental neurotoxicology of endocrine disruptors and pesticides: identification of information gaps and research needs.
    Tilson HA
    Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Jun; 106 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):807-11. PubMed ID: 9646041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Toxicologic risk assessment and prevention: rational and irrational approaches].
    Forth W
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1996 Dec; 199(2-4):227-39. PubMed ID: 9409918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
    Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Shellfish and residual chemical contaminants: hazards, monitoring, and health risk assessment along French coasts.
    Guéguen M; Amiard JC; Arnich N; Badot PM; Claisse D; Guérin T; Vernoux JP
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011; 213():55-111. PubMed ID: 21541848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Econonic implications of hormesis: some additional thoughts.
    Smith VK; Evans MF
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2004 Jun; 23(6):285-7; discussion 303-5. PubMed ID: 15301155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. California's Proposition 65: extrapolating animal toxicity to humans.
    Kilgore WW
    Am J Ind Med; 1990; 18(4):491-4. PubMed ID: 2248253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Human exposure assessment: finding out what's getting in.
    Wakefield J
    Environ Health Perspect; 2000 Jan; 108(1):A24-6. PubMed ID: 10620534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Chemicals of emerging concern in the Great Lakes Basin: an analysis of environmental exposures.
    Klecka G; Persoon C; Currie R
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010; 207():1-93. PubMed ID: 20652664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Economic implications of hormesis in policy making.
    Griffiths C
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2004 Jun; 23(6):281-3; discussion 303-5. PubMed ID: 15301154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [EXPERIENCE OF THE MULTIPLE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF RISKS FOR POPULATION'S HEALTH WITH THE AIM TO PROVIDE THE SAFETY OF THE POPULATION OF THE CITY OF CHELIABINSK].
    Valeullina NN; Ural'shin AG; Brylina NA; Nikiforova EV; Beketov AL; Grechko GS
    Gig Sanit; 2015; 94(2):19-23. PubMed ID: 26155637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Environmental chemicals, respiratory hypersensitization and international chemical safety.
    Smith E
    Toxicol Lett; 1996 Aug; 86(2-3):61-3. PubMed ID: 8711777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Low-level toxicity of chemicals: No acceptable levels?
    Lanphear BP
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(12):e2003066. PubMed ID: 29257830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. How many high production chemicals are rodent carcinogens? Why should we care? What do we need to do about it?
    Johnson FM
    Mutat Res; 2003 Jun; 543(3):201-15. PubMed ID: 12787813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Human health risk and exposure assessment of chromium (VI) in tap water.
    Paustenbach DJ; Finley BL; Mowat FS; Kerger BD
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2003 Jul; 66(14):1295-339. PubMed ID: 12851114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Biological monitoring of chemical exposure].
    Fiala Z; Vyskocil A; Srb V
    Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) Suppl; 1998; 41(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 10103162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. New developments in exposure assessment: the impact on the practice of health risk assessment and epidemiological studies.
    Nieuwenhuijsen M; Paustenbach D; Duarte-Davidson R
    Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):996-1009. PubMed ID: 16875734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.