69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12192448)
1. Evidence for effects of phonological correspondence between visible speech and written syllables.
Kerzel D
Psychol Res; 2002 Aug; 66(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 12192448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Motor activation from visible speech: evidence from stimulus response compatibility.
Kerzel D; Bekkering H
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):634-47. PubMed ID: 10811167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the McGurk effect for spoken and sung syllables.
Quinto L; Thompson WF; Russo FA; Trehub SE
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1450-4. PubMed ID: 20675792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility.
Zhang HH; Zhang J; Kornblum S
Cogn Psychol; 1999 May; 38(3):386-432. PubMed ID: 10328858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing.
Stins JF; Michaels CF
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):569-89. PubMed ID: 10881619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition.
Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Notebaert W; Vandierendonck A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Nov; 120(3):307-26. PubMed ID: 15993830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of syllable frequency in speech production.
Cholin J; Levelt WJ; Schiller NO
Cognition; 2006 Mar; 99(2):205-35. PubMed ID: 15939415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Priming vs. rhyming: orthographic and phonological representations in the left and right hemispheres.
Lindell AK; Lum JA
Brain Cogn; 2008 Nov; 68(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 18556102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Top-down task effects overrule automatic multisensory responses to letter-sound pairs in auditory association cortex.
van Atteveldt NM; Formisano E; Goebel R; Blomert L
Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1345-60. PubMed ID: 17513133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vowel processing during silent reading: evidence from eye movements.
Ashby J; Treiman R; Kessler B; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):416-24. PubMed ID: 16569156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asymmetries for the visual expression and perception of speech.
Nicholls ME; Searle DA
Brain Lang; 2006 Jun; 97(3):322-31. PubMed ID: 16430950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
Paelecke M; Kunde W
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):627-44. PubMed ID: 17563226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The phonological awareness abilities of children with cerebral palsy who do not speak.
Card R; Dodd B
Augment Altern Commun; 2006 Sep; 22(3):149-59. PubMed ID: 17114160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Backward-compatibility effects with irrelevant stimulus-response overlap: the case of the SNARC effect.
Caessens B; Hommel B; Reynvoet B; van der Goten K
J Gen Psychol; 2004 Oct; 131(4):411-25. PubMed ID: 15523822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.
Nakamoto H; Mori S
Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():179-88. PubMed ID: 18048011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Audio-visual matching of speech and non-speech oral gestures in patients with aphasia and apraxia of speech.
Schmid G; Ziegler W
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):546-55. PubMed ID: 16129459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phonological processing in deaf children: when lipreading and cues are incongruent.
Alegria J; Lechat J
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 15778209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrophysiological evidence for early interaction between talker and linguistic information during speech perception.
Kaganovich N; Francis AL; Melara RD
Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):161-72. PubMed ID: 16920083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in speech.
Galantucci B; Fowler CA; Goldstein L
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1138-49. PubMed ID: 19525543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Task-irrelevant visual letters interact with the processing of speech sounds in heteromodal and unimodal cortex.
Blau V; van Atteveldt N; Formisano E; Goebel R; Blomert L
Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 28(3):500-9. PubMed ID: 18702722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
