884 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12192460)
21. [Application of frequency doubling technology perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
Kawa P; Jurkowska J; Zarnowski T; Zagórski Z
Klin Oczna; 2002; 104(5-6):391-4. PubMed ID: 12664488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pulsar perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
Zeppieri M; Brusini P; Parisi L; Johnson CA; Sampaolesi R; Salvetat ML
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 149(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 19800607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of diabetes on glaucoma screening using frequency-doubling perimetry.
Realini T; Lai MQ; Barber L
Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2133-6. PubMed ID: 15522382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Polarimetric measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma diagnosis.
Horn FK; Jonas JB; Martus P; Mardin CY; Budde WM
J Glaucoma; 1999 Dec; 8(6):353-62. PubMed ID: 10604293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Keratometry, optic disc dimensions, and degree and progression of glaucomatous optic nerve damage.
Jonas JB; Stroux A; Martus P; Budde W
J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 16778642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The association between glaucomatous visual fields and optic nerve head features in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.
Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Anderson DR; Levine RA; Fan J; Cello KE; Quigley HA; Budenz DL; Parrish RK; Kass MA; Gordon MO;
Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1603-12. PubMed ID: 16949445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Visual field testing with the new Humphrey Matrix: a comparison between the FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests.
Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Felletti M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 16704697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation in the detection of glaucoma with localized visual field defects.
Kook MS; Cho HS; Seong M; Choi J
Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1970-8. PubMed ID: 16185765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Frequency doubling perimetry and the detection of eye disease in the community.
Cioffi GA; Mansberger S; Spry P; Johnson C; Van Buskirk EM
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2000; 98():195-9; discussion 199-202. PubMed ID: 11190023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the high specificity Screening Program (C-20-1) of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimeter in clinical practice.
North RV; Jones AL; Hunter E; Morgan JE; Wild JM
Eye (Lond); 2006 Jun; 20(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 15999135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Combined evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for glaucoma detection using automated classification.
Horn FK; Lämmer R; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG; Michelson G; Lausen B; Adler W
J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 21173705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. I. Baseline sensitivity and specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter and the GDx nerve fibre analyser.
Heeg GP; Blanksma LJ; Hardus PL; Jansonius NM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Feb; 83(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 15715556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Measurement of Friedmann Visual Field Analyzer tests in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Cox MJ; Wood IC
Optom Vis Sci; 1993 May; 70(5):421-32. PubMed ID: 8515973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predictive factors of the optic nerve head for development or progression of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Jonas JB; Martus P; Horn FK; Jünemann A; Korth M; Budde WM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Aug; 45(8):2613-8. PubMed ID: 15277484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
