These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12192477)

  • 1. Assessment of a newer technique for cesarean section.
    Lurie S; Feinstein M; Mamet Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2002 Aug; 266(4):195-7. PubMed ID: 12192477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Post-cesarean section morbidity in HIV-positive women.
    Maiques-Montesinos V; Cervera-Sanchez J; Bellver-Pradas J; Abad-Carrascosa A; Serra-Serra V
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):789-92. PubMed ID: 10535342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Results of the Misgav Ladach caesarean section].
    Heidenreich W; Borgmann U
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Nov; 123(11):634-7. PubMed ID: 11797161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative trial between traditional cesarean section and Misgav-Ladach technique].
    Gutiérrez JG; Coló JA; Arreola MS
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2008 Feb; 76(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 18798399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Myomectomy during cesarean section: a safe procedure?
    Hassiakos D; Christopoulos P; Vitoratos N; Xarchoulakou E; Vaggos G; Papadias K
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Dec; 1092():408-13. PubMed ID: 17308166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Towards simplified cesarean section?].
    Gaucherand P; Bessai K; Sergeant P; Rudigoz RC
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Jun; 30(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 11431614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: clinical experience.
    Kulas T; Habek D; Karsa M; Bobić-Vuković M
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2008; 65(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 18196903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An incision technique for emergency cesarean section.
    Goodlin RC
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Dec; 165(6):544-6. PubMed ID: 2961096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Stark's method of cesarean section. Advantages compared to the traditional method].
    Corosu R; Roma B; Vizzaccaro F; Franchi M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1999 May; 51(5):203-5. PubMed ID: 10431531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pregnancy outcomes of multiple repeated cesarean sections in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.
    Wuttikonsammakit P; Sukcharoen N
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89 Suppl 4():S81-6. PubMed ID: 17725144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cesarean section: Pelosi's simplified technique].
    Pelosi MA; Ortega I
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1994; 59(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 7569153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of the ''Misgav Ladach'' and traditional Pfannenstiel surgical techniques for cesarean section.
    Belci D; Kos M; Zoricić D; Kuharić L; Slivar A; Begić-Razem E; Grdinić I
    Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Jun; 59(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 17576402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extremely preterm cesarean delivery: a clinical study.
    Högberg U; Håkansson S; Serenius F; Holmgren PA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1442-7. PubMed ID: 17260219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Innovations of the Stark method for cesarean section. Comparison of techniques].
    Grignaffini A; Bazzani F; Rinaldi M; Azzoni D; Vadora E
    Minerva Ginecol; 1999 Dec; 51(12):475-82. PubMed ID: 10767996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The modified Misgav-Ladach versus the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique for cesarean section: a randomized trial.
    Xavier P; Ayres-De-Campos D; Reynolds A; Guimarães M; Costa-Santos C; Patrício B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Sep; 84(9):878-82. PubMed ID: 16097980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean.
    Komoto Y; Shimoya K; Shimizu T; Kimura T; Hayashi S; Temma-Asano K; Kanagawa T; Fukuda H; Murata Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Aug; 32(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 16882265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section.
    Levy R; Chernomoretz T; Appelman Z; Levin D; Or Y; Hagay ZJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jul; 121(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 15961214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cesarean section and simultaneous hernia repair.
    Ochsenbein-Kölble N; Demartines N; Ochsenbein-Imhof N; Zimmermann R
    Arch Surg; 2004 Aug; 139(8):893-5. PubMed ID: 15302700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for surgical site infection following cesarean section].
    Su GD; Gong SP; Yu YH
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2005 Aug; 25(8):1005-6. PubMed ID: 16109561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of the intra- and postoperative course in 254 extraperitoneal and 102 intraperitoneal cesarean sections].
    Joschko R
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1974 Dec; 96(49):1553-62. PubMed ID: 4454801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.