These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12192575)
41. Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses. Kunimoto C; Miller J; Pashler H Conscious Cogn; 2001 Sep; 10(3):294-340. PubMed ID: 11697867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Are discrimination thresholds a valid measure of variance for judgments of slant from texture? Todd JT; Christensen JC; Guckes KM J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):20.1-18. PubMed ID: 20462321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Visual discrimination in cats: physical parameters of stimuli and effects of visual cortex ablation. Batuev AS; Cherenkova LV Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1978; 38(4):179-93. PubMed ID: 726950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The effect of normal aging on closed contour shape discrimination. McKendrick AM; Weymouth AE; Battista J J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):1.1-9. PubMed ID: 20462302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Asymmetric interference between the perception of shape and the perception of surface properties. Cant JS; Goodale MA J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):13.1-20. PubMed ID: 19757891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Poor haptic orientation discrimination in nonsighted children may reflect disruption of cross-sensory calibration. Gori M; Sandini G; Martinoli C; Burr D Curr Biol; 2010 Feb; 20(3):223-5. PubMed ID: 20116249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition. Lawson R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):911-30. PubMed ID: 19653738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Bandpass characteristics of high-frequency sensitivity and visual experience in blindsight. Seifert D; Falter C; Strasburger H; Elliott MA Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 20129798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Haptic roughness perception of linear gratings via bare finger or rigid probe. Lawrence MA; Kitada R; Klatzky RL; Lederman SJ Perception; 2007; 36(4):547-57. PubMed ID: 17564201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Why do shape aftereffects increase with eccentricity? Gheorghiu E; Kingdom FA; Bell J; Gurnsey R J Vis; 2011 Dec; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 22186273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Foveal blur discrimination of the human eye. Wang B; Ciuffreda KJ Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jan; 25(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 15649182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Contrast sensitivity of form and motion discrimination during binocular rivalry. Li DF; Freeman AW; Alais D Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1255-63. PubMed ID: 15733958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Haptic shape discrimination in humans: insight into haptic frames of reference. Voisin J; Michaud G; Chapman CE Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 164(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 15959722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Separate mechanisms for perception of numerosity and density. Anobile G; Cicchini GM; Burr DC Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):265-70. PubMed ID: 24270462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Three-dimensional symmetric shapes are discriminated more efficiently than asymmetric ones. Liu Z; Kersten D J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2003 Jul; 20(7):1331-40. PubMed ID: 12868638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The Weber fraction versus perceived similarity. King DL; Henry GE; Shanks SC Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Dec; 89(3 Pt 1):903-14. PubMed ID: 10665024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Do rats use shape to solve "shape discriminations"? Minini L; Jeffery KJ Learn Mem; 2006; 13(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 16705141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Imperfect invariance to object translation in the discrimination of complex shapes. Dill M; Edelman S Perception; 2001; 30(6):707-24. PubMed ID: 11464559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]