BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12194667)

  • 1. In vivo evaluation of a moisture-activated orthodontic adhesive: a comparative clinical trial.
    Karamouzos A; Mavropoulos A; Athanasiou AE; Kolokithas G
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2002 Aug; 5(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 12194667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial.
    Mavropoulos A; Karamouzos A; Kolokithas G; Athanasiou AE
    J Orthod; 2003 Jun; 30(2):139-47; discussion 127-8. PubMed ID: 12835430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of a cyanoacrylate adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets: an ex-vivo study.
    Al-Munajed MK; Gordon PH; McCabe JF
    J Orthod; 2000 Sep; 27(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 11099558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets.
    Lippitz SJ; Staley RN; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):620-4. PubMed ID: 9637564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Twelve-month bracket failure rate with amorphous calcium phosphate bonding system.
    Hammad SM; El Banna MS; Elsaka SE
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Oct; 35(5):622-7. PubMed ID: 22940263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical bond failure of pre-coated and operator-coated orthodontic brackets.
    Kula K; Schreiner R; Brown J; Glaros A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2002 Aug; 5(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 12194665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
    Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Summers A; Kao E; Gilmore J; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A three-year clinical trial using a glass ionomer cement for the bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Miller JR; Mancl L; Arbuckle G; Baldwin J; Phillips RW
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 8863967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Construction of an
    Goyal S; Kulkarni N; Naik A; Naik B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Feb; 23(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 35748449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical acceptability of two self-etch adhesive resins for the bonding of orthodontic brackets to enamel.
    Schnebel B; Mateer S; Maganzini AL; Freeman K
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 23269689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Six-month bracket failure rate evaluation of a self-etching primer.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Turk T; Cakmak F
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 18216373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Six-month bracket failure rate with a flowable composite: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial.
    Krishnan S; Pandian S; Rajagopal R
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 28658358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of a moisture-active adhesive for indirect bonding.
    Klocke A; Shi J; Kahl-Nieke B; Bismayer U
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):697-701. PubMed ID: 14719735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do we need primer for orthodontic bonding? A randomized controlled trial.
    Nandhra SS; Littlewood SJ; Houghton N; Luther F; Prabhu J; Munyombwe T; Wood SR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 25234405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of adhesion promoters and curing-light sources on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Machado CT; Borges BC; Araujo GJ; dos Santos AJ; Dametto FR; Pinheiro FH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):747-52. PubMed ID: 23649057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative assessment of bonding time and 1-year bracket survival using flash-free and conventional adhesives for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Grünheid T; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Nov; 154(5):621-628. PubMed ID: 30384932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.