These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12194667)

  • 21. The effect of saliva on shear bond strengths of hydrophilic bonding systems.
    Webster MJ; Nanda RS; Duncanson MG; Khajotia SS; Sinha PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 11174540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are flowable resin-based composites a reliable material for metal orthodontic bracket bonding?
    Pick B; Rosa V; Azeredo TR; Cruz Filho EA; Miranda WG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jul; 11(4):E017-24. PubMed ID: 20953560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. LED vs halogen light-curing of adhesive-precoated brackets.
    Mirabella D; Spena R; Scognamiglio G; Luca L; Gracco A; Siciliani G
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 18298197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Survival analysis of brackets and tubes: A twelve-month assessment.
    Jung MH
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1034-40. PubMed ID: 24665886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to crown porcelains.
    Chay SH; Wattanapayungkul P; Yap AU; Loh PL; Chung SM
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 May; 21(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 16433077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does ozone water affect the bond strengths of orthodontic brackets?
    Pithon MM; dos Santos RL
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 20575204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives.
    Bishara SE; Laffoon JF; Vonwald L; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 May; 121(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 12045771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Moisture-insensitive adhesives: reactivity with water and bond strength to wet and saliva-contaminated enamel.
    Eliades T; Katsavrias E; Eliades G
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Feb; 24(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 11887377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.
    Nkenke E; Hirschfelder U; Martus P; Eberhard H
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9239956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laboratory evaluation of a self-etching primer for orthodontic bonding.
    Aljubouri YD; Millett DT; Gilmour WH
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Aug; 25(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 12938848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of applying a sustained force during bonding orthodontic brackets on the adhesive layer and on shear bond strength.
    Montasser MA
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):402-6. PubMed ID: 21030470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of bracket bonding using two different polymerization sources.
    Koupis NS; Eliades T; Athanasiou AE
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):922-5. PubMed ID: 18298204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparative assessment of bracket survival and adhesive removal time using flash-free or conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Grünheid T; Larson BE
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 30230375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In-vitro bond strengths and clinical failure rates of metal brackets bonded with different light-emitting diode units and curing times.
    Oz AA; Oz AZ; Arici S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 26827977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative clinical trial of a compomer and a resin adhesive for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; McCluskey LA; McAuley F; Creanor SL; Newell J; Love J
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 10926433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Should silane coupling agents be used when bonding brackets to composite restorations? An in vitro study.
    Eslamian L; Ghassemi A; Amini F; Jafari A; Afrand M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 19193708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An ex vivo assessment of gingivally offset lower premolar brackets.
    Thind BS; Larmour CJ; Stirrups DR; Lloyd CH
    J Orthod; 2004 Mar; 31(1):34-40; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 15071150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Shear bond strength of fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding and composite materials.
    Pseiner BC; Freudenthaler J; Jonke E; Bantleon HP
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 20080958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.