These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12194896)

  • 21. Putting chemical and environmental sensitivities in perspective.
    Waickman FJ; Vojdani A
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1998 Feb; 31(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 9530677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neurophysiological effects of flickering light in patients with perceived electrical hypersensitivity.
    Sandström M; Lyskov E; Berglund A; Medvedev S; Mild KH
    J Occup Environ Med; 1997 Jan; 39(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 9029427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characteristics of perceived electromagnetic hypersensitivity in the general population.
    Gruber MJ; Palmquist E; Nordin S
    Scand J Psychol; 2018 Aug; 59(4):422-427. PubMed ID: 29741795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Race/ethnicity and self-reported diabetes among adults in the National Health Interview Survey: 2000-2003.
    Borrell LN; Crawford ND; Dailo FJ
    Public Health Rep; 2007; 122(5):616-25. PubMed ID: 17877309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Shielding methods and products against man-made Electromagnetic Fields: Protection versus risk.
    Panagopoulos DJ; Chrousos GP
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 667():255-262. PubMed ID: 30831365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The implications of non-linear biological oscillations on human electrophysiology for electrohypersensitivity (EHS) and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS).
    Sage C
    Rev Environ Health; 2015; 30(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 26368042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Psychological factors associated with self-reported sensitivity to mobile phones.
    Rubin GJ; Cleare AJ; Wessely S
    J Psychosom Res; 2008 Jan; 64(1):1-9; discussion 11-2. PubMed ID: 18157992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Brain cancer risk and electromagnetic fields (EMFs): assessing the geomagnetic component.
    Aldrich TE; Andrews KW; Liboff AR
    Arch Environ Health; 2001; 56(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 11572274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: biological effects of dirty electricity with emphasis on diabetes and multiple sclerosis.
    Havas M
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2006; 25(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 17178585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A theoretical model based upon mast cells and histamine to explain the recently proclaimed sensitivity to electric and/or magnetic fields in humans.
    Gangi S; Johansson O
    Med Hypotheses; 2000 Apr; 54(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 10859662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prevalence of annoyance attributed to electrical equipment and smells in a Swedish population, and relationship with subjective health and daily functioning.
    Carlsson F; Karlson B; Ørbaek P; Osterberg K; Ostergren PO
    Public Health; 2005 Jul; 119(7):568-77. PubMed ID: 15925670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does electromagnetic hypersensitivity originate from nocebo responses? Indications from a qualitative study.
    Dieudonné M
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2016 Jan; 37(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 26369906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Subjective non-specific symptoms related with electromagnetic fields: description of 2 cases].
    Gobba F
    Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 26(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 12408003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reliable disease biomarkers characterizing and identifying electrohypersensitivity and multiple chemical sensitivity as two etiopathogenic aspects of a unique pathological disorder.
    Belpomme D; Campagnac C; Irigaray P
    Rev Environ Health; 2015; 30(4):251-71. PubMed ID: 26613326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Becoming electro-hypersensitive: A replication study.
    Dieudonné M
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2019 Apr; 40(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 30920673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Overlap in prevalence between various types of environmental intolerance.
    Palmquist E; Claeson AS; Neely G; Stenberg B; Nordin S
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2014; 217(4-5):427-34. PubMed ID: 24029726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Psychological symptoms and health-related quality of life in idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields.
    Kjellqvist A; Palmquist E; Nordin S
    J Psychosom Res; 2016 May; 84():8-12. PubMed ID: 27095153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrical hypersensitivity in humans--fact or fiction?
    Silny J
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1999 Aug; 202(2-4):219-33. PubMed ID: 10507130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Life styles, anxiety, expertise: the perception of risk from electromagnetic fields.
    Deitinger P; Nardella C; Ronchetti M; Bonafede M; Grandi C
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2011; 33(3 Suppl B):B14-20. PubMed ID: 23326945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Self-reported chemical sensitivity in Germany: a population-based survey.
    Hausteiner C; Bornschein S; Hansen J; Zilker T; Förstl H
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2005; 208(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 16078641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.