These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12195499)

  • 41. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography.
    Honey ID; Mackenzie A; Evans DS
    Br J Radiol; 2005 May; 78(929):422-7. PubMed ID: 15845936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
    Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Diagnostic radiography students' experiences of a practical method demonstrating the effect of milliampere-second in digital X-ray imaging systems.
    Lewis S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):422-426. PubMed ID: 34261614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Optimization of the chest exposure condition with a contrast-detail phantom: evaluation of the flat-panel versus computed radiography systems].
    Kinoshita E; Umezu Y; Ogawa K; Katou T; Arimura H; Yoshikawa H; Higashida Y; Ooki M; Toyofuku F
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jul; 60(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 15340278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
    Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
    Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Smith A; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140613. PubMed ID: 25571914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of radiation dose reduction on clinical image quality in chest radiography of premature neonates using a dual-side readout technique computed radiography system.
    Carlander A; Hansson J; Söderberg J; Steneryd K; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):275-80. PubMed ID: 20200106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of x-ray tube potential on image quality and patient dose for lumbar spine computed radiography examinations.
    Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K; Al Wathiqi G; Al Ostath H
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 28(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 16506618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
    Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Towards image quality, beam energy and effective dose optimisation in digital thoracic radiography.
    Launders JH; Cowen AR; Bury RF; Hawkridge P
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(5):870-5. PubMed ID: 11372626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of two objective methods to optimize kVp and personnel exposure using a digital indirect flat panel detector and simulated veterinary patients.
    Copple C; Robertson ID; Thrall DE; Samei E
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2013; 54(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23293957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Patient-size-dependent radiation dose optimisation technique for abdominal CT examinations.
    Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 21357583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A phantom for dose-image quality optimization in chest radiography.
    Vassileva J
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Oct; 75(898):837-42. PubMed ID: 12381693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients.
    Jablanovic D; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Damjanov N; Seric S; Radak-Perovic M; Arandjic D; Maksimovic R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 23185070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. General equations for optimal selection of diagnostic image acquisition parameters in clinical X-ray imaging.
    Zheng X
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Dec; 10(4):415-421. PubMed ID: 28822074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.