233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12195797)
1. Monthly model for genetic evaluation of laying hens. II. Random regression.
Anang A; Mielenz N; Schüler L
Br Poult Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 12195797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monthly model for genetic evaluation of laying hens 1. Fixed regression.
Anang A; Mielenz N; Schüler L
Br Poult Sci; 2001 May; 42(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 11421327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of genetic parameters based on individual and group mean records in laying hens.
Nurgiartiningsih VM; Mielenz N; Preisinger R; Schmutz M; Schueler L
Br Poult Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(5):604-10. PubMed ID: 15623212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
Dechow CD; Norman HD
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of genetic parameters for partial egg production periods by means of random regression models.
Venturini GC; Grossi DA; Ramos SB; Cruz VA; Souza CG; Ledur MC; El Faro L; Schmidt GS; Munari DP
Genet Mol Res; 2012 Jul; 11(3):1819-29. PubMed ID: 22869538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of test-day records beyond three hundred five days for estimation of three hundred five-day breeding values for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins.
Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5314-25. PubMed ID: 19762849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using test day yields and random regression model.
Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR; Dekkers JC
J Dairy Sci; 1997 Jun; 80(6):1217-26. PubMed ID: 9201594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accessing genotype by environment interaction using within- and across-country test-day random regression sire models.
Hammami H; Rekik B; Soyeurt H; Bastin C; Bay E; Stoll J; Gengler N
J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Oct; 126(5):366-77. PubMed ID: 19765163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic heterogeneity of variance in production traits of laying hens.
Wolc A; Lisowski M; Hill WG; White IM
Br Poult Sci; 2011 Oct; 52(5):537-40. PubMed ID: 22029779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic analysis of somatic cell score in Norwegian cattle using random regression test-day models.
Odegård J; Jensen J; Klemetsdal G; Madsen P; Heringstad B
J Dairy Sci; 2003 Dec; 86(12):4103-14. PubMed ID: 14740851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic evaluation for length of productive life with censored records.
Vukasinovic N; Moll J; Künzi N
J Dairy Sci; 1999 Oct; 82(10):2178-85. PubMed ID: 10531604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of international dairy sire evaluations from meta-analysis of national estimated breeding values and direct analysis of individual animal performance records.
Maltecca C; Bagnato A; Weigel KA
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2599-605. PubMed ID: 15328284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genotype x environment interaction for grazing versus confinement. I. Production traits.
Kearney JF; Schutz MM; Boettcher PJ; Weigel KA
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Feb; 87(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 14762093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different models for genetic evaluation of egg weight in Mazandaran fowl.
Zamani P; Jasouri M; Moradi MR
Br Poult Sci; 2015; 56(6):631-8. PubMed ID: 26620771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of the free range behaviour of laying hens and the genetic and phenotypic relationships with laying performance.
Icken W; Cavero D; Schmutz M; Thurner S; Wendl G; Preisinger R
Br Poult Sci; 2008 Sep; 49(5):533-41. PubMed ID: 18836899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Curvilinear inbreeding effects on some performance traits in laying hens.
Szwaczkowski T; Cywa-Benko K; Wezyk S
J Appl Genet; 2004; 45(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 15306727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic evaluation of Australian dairy cattle for somatic cell scores using multi-trait random regression test-day model.
Konstantinov KV; Beard KT; Goddard ME; van der Werf JH
J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Jun; 126(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19646149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Approaches to estimating daily yield from single milk testing schemes and use of a.m.-p.m. records in test-day model genetic evaluation in dairy cattle.
Liu Z; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Kuwan K
J Dairy Sci; 2000 Nov; 83(11):2672-82. PubMed ID: 11104288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of performance records and national breeding values as input into international genetic evaluation.
Fikse WF
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2709-19. PubMed ID: 15328297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Random regression models for male and female fertility evaluation using longitudinal binary data.
Averill T; Rekaya R; Weigel K
J Dairy Sci; 2006 Sep; 89(9):3681-9. PubMed ID: 16899704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
