These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12196854)

  • 21. A prospective evaluation of bone mineral density measurement in females who have fallen.
    Newton JL; Kenny RA; Frearson R; Francis RM
    Age Ageing; 2003 Sep; 32(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 12957998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of Singh Index and Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians as risk assessment tools of hip fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Liu Z; Gao H; Bai X; Zhao L; Li Y; Wang B
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Mar; 12(1):37. PubMed ID: 28253896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bone mineral density at different sites and vertebral fractures in Serbian postmenopausal women.
    Ilic Stojanovic O; Vuceljic M; Lazovic M; Gajic M; Radosavljevic N; Nikolic D; Andjic M; Spiroski D; Vujovic S
    Climacteric; 2017 Feb; 20(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 27860483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Peripheral and central measurements of bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with clinical risk factors for osteoporosis.
    Patel R; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2007 Feb; 80(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17308990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Low BMD is a risk factor for low-energy Colles' fractures in women before and after menopause.
    Hung LK; Wu HT; Leung PC; Qin L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Jun; (435):219-25. PubMed ID: 15930942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of low bone mass and prediction of fracture risk using metacarpal radiogrammetry method: a comparative study with DXA and X-ray phantom.
    Ashok Kumar D; Anburajan M; Snekhalatha U
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2018 Jul; 21(7):1350-1371. PubMed ID: 29968333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Osteoporosis in postmenopausal Saudi women using dual x-ray bone densitometry.
    El-Desouki MI
    Saudi Med J; 2003 Sep; 24(9):953-6. PubMed ID: 12973476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of parity on bone mineral density among postmenopausal Saudi Arabian women.
    Sadat-Ali M; Al-Habdan I; Al-Mulhim AA; El-Hassan AY
    Saudi Med J; 2005 Oct; 26(10):1588-90. PubMed ID: 16228061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.
    Oka R; Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I
    Endocr J; 2018 Feb; 65(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 29151451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Primary care use of FRAX: absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women and older men.
    Siris ES; Baim S; Nattiv A
    Postgrad Med; 2010 Jan; 122(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 20107292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contributions of bone density and structure to fracture risk assessment in men and women.
    Melton LJ; Beck TJ; Amin S; Khosla S; Achenbach SJ; Oberg AL; Riggs BL
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 May; 16(5):460-7. PubMed ID: 15688123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Colles' fracture of the wrist as an indicator of underlying osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a prospective study of bone mineral density and bone turnover rate.
    Earnshaw SA; Cawte SA; Worley A; Hosking DJ
    Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 9692078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Better bone density reporting: T-score report versus fracture risk report with outcome analysis.
    Greenwald L; Barajas K; White-Greenwald M
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Oct; 9(10):665-70. PubMed ID: 14572176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Independent predictors of all osteoporosis-related fractures in healthy postmenopausal women: the OFELY study.
    Albrand G; Munoz F; Sornay-Rendu E; DuBoeuf F; Delmas PD
    Bone; 2003 Jan; 32(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 12584039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture.
    Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Jergas M; Breitenseher M; Glüer CC; Yu W; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 7484286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to predict need for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning in postmenopausal women.
    Chao AS; Chen FP; Lin YC; Huang TS; Fan CM; Yu YW
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 54(6):722-5. PubMed ID: 26700992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prediction of osteoporotic fractures by bone densitometry and COLIA1 genotyping: a prospective, population-based study in men and women.
    McGuigan FE; Armbrecht G; Smith R; Felsenberg D; Reid DM; Ralston SH
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 11303720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bone mineral density of the spine, hip and distal forearm in representative samples of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study.
    Iki M; Kagamimori S; Kagawa Y; Matsuzaki T; Yoneshima H; Marumo F
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):529-37. PubMed ID: 11527049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Osteodensitometry in healthy postmenopausal women.
    Prescrire Int; 2008 Apr; 17(94):68-72. PubMed ID: 18536138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.