These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Intensity resolution and subjective magnitude in psychophysical scaling. Ward LM; Armstrong J; Golestani N Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jul; 58(5):793-801. PubMed ID: 8710456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A memory model of sequential effects in scaling tasks. Lockhead GR; King MC J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Jun; 9(3):461-73. PubMed ID: 6223983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The slippery context effect in psychophysics: intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua. Marks LE Percept Psychophys; 1992 Feb; 51(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 1549437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unmasking the magnitude estimation response. Mori S; Ward LM Can J Psychol; 1990 Mar; 44(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 2078833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-modality matching in memory psychophysics: brightness and loudness. Hubbard TL Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Jun; 76(3 Pt 2):1339-57. PubMed ID: 8337090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Loci of contextual effects in judgment. Mellers BA; Birnbaum MH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Aug; 8(4):582-601. PubMed ID: 6214609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stimulus context and absolute magnitude estimation: a study of individual differences. Gescheider GA; Hughson BA Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 1881765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of range on category scaling of loudness judgments. Payne MC; Corso GM Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Apr; 60(2):619-24. PubMed ID: 4000884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deriving the loudness exponent from categorical judgments. Norwich KH; Sagi E Percept Psychophys; 2002 Jul; 64(5):804-14. PubMed ID: 12201339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Higher order sequential effects in psychophysical judgments. Petzold P; Haubensak G Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):969-78. PubMed ID: 11578058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integration of stimulus dimensions in perception and memory: composition rules and psychophysical relations. Algom D; Wolf Y; Bergman B J Exp Psychol Gen; 1985 Dec; 114(4):451-71. PubMed ID: 2934498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Categorical judgments do not modify sensory representations in working memory. Luu L; Stocker AA PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jun; 17(6):e1008968. PubMed ID: 34061849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Range and regression, loudness scales, and loudness processing: toward a context-bound psychophysics. Algom D; Marks LE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):706-27. PubMed ID: 2148587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Remember judgments and the constraint of direct experience. Stoettinger E; Kaiser W; Perner J Psychol Res; 2009 Sep; 73(5):623-32. PubMed ID: 18987880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring tinnitus loudness using constrained psychophysical scaling. Ward LM; Baumann M Am J Audiol; 2009 Dec; 18(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 19638478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnitude judgments of loudness change for discrete, dynamic, and hybrid stimuli. Pastore RE; Flint J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):886-907. PubMed ID: 21264709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments? Schneider B; Parker S Percept Psychophys; 1990 Nov; 48(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 2247323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]