These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12198789)

  • 1. Learning categories at different hierarchical levels: a comparison of category learning models.
    Palmeri TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Sep; 6(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 12198789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: a replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961).
    Nosofsky RM; Gluck MA; Palmeri TJ; McKinley SC; Glauthier P
    Mem Cognit; 1994 May; 22(3):352-69. PubMed ID: 8007837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.
    Nosofsky RM; Kruschke JK; McKinley SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Mar; 18(2):211-33. PubMed ID: 1532819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.
    Kruschke JK
    Psychol Rev; 1992 Jan; 99(1):22-44. PubMed ID: 1546117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Base rates in category learning.
    Kruschke JK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Jan; 22(1):3-26. PubMed ID: 8648289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning categories by making predictions: an investigation of indirect category learning.
    Minda JP; Ross BH
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1355-68. PubMed ID: 15900929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induction of category distributions: a framework for classification learning.
    Fried LS; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Apr; 10(2):234-57. PubMed ID: 6242740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What's behind different kinds of kinds: effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories.
    Kloos H; Sloutsky VM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):52-72. PubMed ID: 18248129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.
    Jee BD; Wiley J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1786-807. PubMed ID: 24320007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tests of an exemplar-memory model of classification learning in a high-dimensional natural-science category domain.
    Nosofsky RM; Sanders CA; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Mar; 147(3):328-353. PubMed ID: 29058939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distributional expectations and the induction of category structure.
    Flannagan MJ; Fried LS; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Apr; 12(2):241-56. PubMed ID: 2939181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.
    Cook RG; Smith JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1059-67. PubMed ID: 17201788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The development of category learning strategies: what makes the difference?
    Hammer R; Diesendruck G; Weinshall D; Hochstein S
    Cognition; 2009 Jul; 112(1):105-19. PubMed ID: 19426967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Connectionism and the learning of probabilistic concepts.
    Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1990 May; 42(2):209-37. PubMed ID: 2367681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More than one kind of inference: re-examining what's learned in feature inference and classification.
    Sweller N; Hayes BK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1568-89. PubMed ID: 20373228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Base-rate effects in category learning: a comparison of parallel network and memory storage-retrieval models.
    Estes WK; Campbell JA; Hatsopoulos N; Hurwitz JB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):556-71. PubMed ID: 2526853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task and distribution sampling affect auditory category learning.
    Roark CL; Holt LL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1804-1822. PubMed ID: 29968085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of relevance shifts in category acquisition: a test of neural networks.
    Macho S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Jan; 23(1):30-53. PubMed ID: 9028022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Superior single dimension relative to "exclusive or" categorization performance by a patient with category-specific visual agnosia: empirical data and an ALCOVE simulation.
    Dixon MJ; Koehler D; Schweizer TA; Guylee MJ
    Brain Cogn; 2000; 43(1-3):152-8. PubMed ID: 10857684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feedback can be superior to observational training for both rule-based and information-integration category structures.
    Edmunds CE; Milton F; Wills AJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1203-22. PubMed ID: 25397975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.