These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12198791)

  • 1. Strength of context does modulate the subordinate bias effect: a reply to Binder and Rayner.
    Kellas G; Vu H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Sep; 6(3):511-7; discussion 518-22. PubMed ID: 12198791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does contextual strength modulate the subordinate bias effect? A reply to Kellas and Vu.
    Binder KS; Rayner K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Sep; 6(3):518-22. PubMed ID: 27519770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contextual strength and the subordinate bias effect: comment on Martin, Vu, Kellas, and Metcalf.
    Rayner K; Binder KS; Duffy SA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 Nov; 52(4):841-52; discussion 853-5. PubMed ID: 10605394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strength of discourse context as a determinant of the subordinate bias effect.
    Martin C; Vu H; Kellas G; Metcalf K
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 Nov; 52(4):813-39. PubMed ID: 10660407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution.
    Vu H; Kellas G; Paul ST
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):979-1001. PubMed ID: 9796231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of global discourse on lexical ambiguity resolution.
    Vu H; Kellas G; Metcalf K; Herman R
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Mar; 28(2):236-52. PubMed ID: 10790979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phonological typicality influences sentence processing in predictive contexts: reply to Staub, Grant, Clifton, and Rayner (2009).
    Farmer TA; Monaghan P; Misyak JB; Christiansen MH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1318-25. PubMed ID: 21895396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye Movements while Reading Biased Homographs: Effects of Prior Encounter and Biasing Context on Reducing the Subordinate Bias Effect.
    Leinenger M; Rayner K
    J Cogn Psychol (Hove); 2013 Jan; 25(6):665-681. PubMed ID: 24073328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect.
    Sereno SC; O'Donnell PJ; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 16634674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye fixations.
    Kambe G; Rayner K; Duffy SA
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Mar; 29(2):363-72. PubMed ID: 11352220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of sense-contingent argument structure frequencies on ambiguity resolution in aphasia.
    Huck A; Thompson RL; Cruice M; Marshall J
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jun; 100():171-194. PubMed ID: 28392303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tracking competition and cognitive control during language comprehension with multi-voxel pattern analysis.
    Musz E; Thompson-Schill SL
    Brain Lang; 2017 Feb; 165():21-32. PubMed ID: 27898341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing for lexical competition during reading: fast priming with orthographic neighbors.
    Nakayama M; Sears CR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):477-92. PubMed ID: 20364931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Processing ambiguous verbs: evidence from eye movements.
    Pickering MJ; Frisson S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):556-73. PubMed ID: 11294449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemispheric asymmetries in the resolution of lexical ambiguity.
    Coney J; Evans KD
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(3):272-82. PubMed ID: 10678693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age differences and similarities in the shift from computation to retrieval during reading comprehension.
    Rawson KA; Touron DR
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Jun; 24(2):423-37. PubMed ID: 19485659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phonological ambiguity modulates resolution of semantic ambiguity during reading: An fMRI study of Hebrew.
    Bitan T; Kaftory A; Meiri-Leib A; Eviatar Z; Peleg O
    Neuropsychology; 2017 Oct; 31(7):759-777. PubMed ID: 28857601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of lexical and sentence level context effects for dominant and subordinate word meanings of homonyms.
    Booth JR; Harasaki Y; Burman DD
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2006 Nov; 35(6):531-54. PubMed ID: 17053964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies for processing unbounded dependencies: lexical information and verb-argument assignment.
    Pickering MJ; Traxler MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1401-10. PubMed ID: 11713875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.