These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12198925)

  • 1. ["Peer review" in the Lakartidningen. Competent and unbiased, but should openness be also included?].
    Milerad J
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3098-9. PubMed ID: 12198925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Who does sponsor Lakartidningen to keep secrets?].
    Walhjalt B
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Jan; 100(5):349-50. PubMed ID: 12607385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Two years with EBM in Lakartidningen. Clinical research and routine health care closer to each other].
    Werkö L; Asplund K; Aspelin P; Britton M; Eliasson M; af Geijerstam JL; Thelander S
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Sep; 99(36):3478-9, 3482. PubMed ID: 12362745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expert bias in peer review.
    Phillips JS
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Dec; 27(12):2229-33. PubMed ID: 21992074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [What should a medical journal's purpose be--facts or sponsored entertainment?].
    Milerad J
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Dec; 99(50):5062-3. PubMed ID: 12572295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review warts and all.
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):679. PubMed ID: 15280874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Not for your eyes: information concealed through publication bias.
    Kittisupamongkol W
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):558; author reply 558-9. PubMed ID: 19217959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Not for your eyes: information concealed through publication bias.
    Liesegang TJ; Albert DM; Schachat AP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Nov; 146(5):638-40. PubMed ID: 18984084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.
    Senturia SD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 14995024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Peer review: a closed system in need of reform].
    Thörn A
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3106-8. PubMed ID: 12198928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. All the lonely people: by Caveman.
    J Cell Sci; 2004 Aug; 117(Pt 17):3705-6. PubMed ID: 15286170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Why was my article refused?].
    Rosenberg J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Jan; 171(5):303. PubMed ID: 19176154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [How strict should editors be? Nothing is done for the sake of errors].
    Eklund J
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Dec; 101(51-52):4250. PubMed ID: 15658596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Debate on peer review. Report from an international congress on peer review].
    Grimby G
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3109-10. PubMed ID: 12198929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suggesting reviewers.
    Carmichael SW; Agur AM; Seifert MF; Spinner RJ; Tubbs RS; McDonald S; Nicholson H; Lachman N
    Clin Anat; 2006 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 16342266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Five direct questions to Josef Milerad concerning credibility].
    Holmgren PG
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Jan; 100(5):346, 349. PubMed ID: 12607383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Registration of clinical trials--results included now!].
    Schroeder TV
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Apr; 170(18):1535. PubMed ID: 18454920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bad papers by Caveman.
    J Cell Sci; 2005 Mar; 118(Pt 6):1103-4. PubMed ID: 15764593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do journals have a publication bias?
    Pickar JH
    Maturitas; 2007 May; 57(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 17376614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: a randomized controlled trial.
    Emerson GB; Warme WJ; Wolf FM; Heckman JD; Brand RA; Leopold SS
    Arch Intern Med; 2010 Nov; 170(21):1934-9. PubMed ID: 21098355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.