These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12199284)

  • 21. The 'more-abortions' objection to fetal tissue transplantation.
    Gillam L
    J Med Philos; 1998 Jun; 23(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 9831285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Abortion--Catholic pluralism and the potential for dialogue.
    Kaufman PS
    Cross Curr; 1987; 37(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 11658923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The theoretical tenability of the doctrine of double effect.
    Bole TJ
    J Med Philos; 1991 Oct; 16(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 1779207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Abortion as indicative of personal and social identity.
    May WE
    Jurist; 1973; 33(2):199-217. PubMed ID: 11663432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ireland faces a "first".
    Murphy D
    Hum Life Rev; 1997; 23(2):45-52. PubMed ID: 11656679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of responsibility in gynecological oncology.
    Sgreccia E; Di Pietro ML
    Linacre Q; 2003 Aug; 70(3):183-94. PubMed ID: 15040353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Management of a pregnancy with an anencephalic baby.
    Diamond EF
    Linacre Q; 1992 Aug; 59(3):19-23. PubMed ID: 11651446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Who is entitled to double effect?
    Boyle J
    J Med Philos; 1991 Oct; 16(5):475-94; discussion 511-4. PubMed ID: 1779208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An almost absolute value in history.
    Noonan JT
    Hum Life Rev; 1985; 11(1-2):125-78. PubMed ID: 11658576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Therapeutic abortion law confusion.
    Kummer JM; Leavy Z
    JAMA; 1966 Jan; 195(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 6015071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Abortion, health, and the law.
    Greene MF; Ecker JL
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Jan; 350(2):184-6. PubMed ID: 14711920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Killing and letting die -- putting the debate in context.
    Chandler J
    Australas J Philos; 1990 Dec; 68(4):420-31. PubMed ID: 11659437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Management of extrauterine pregnancy.
    Sisters of St. Francis Health Services, Inc
    Ethics Medics; 2006 Mar; 31(3):4. PubMed ID: 16789298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomedicine and bioethics: de lege lata, de lege ferenda. "... the law today, as laid down, and what tomorrow may bring.".
    Smith GP
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():233-58. PubMed ID: 10183888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The doctrine of double effect: reflections on theoretical and practical issues.
    Kamm FM
    J Med Philos; 1991 Oct; 16(5):571-85. PubMed ID: 1779212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The principle of double effect and medical ethics.
    Gillon R
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Jan; 292(6514):193-4. PubMed ID: 3080130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Actions, intentions, and consequences: the doctrine of double effect.
    Quinn WS
    Philos Public Aff; 1989; 18(4):334-51. PubMed ID: 11659159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A thoroughly regressive law.
    Kozakiewicz M
    Plan Parent Chall; 1993; (1):10-1. PubMed ID: 12345315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Further thoughts on double effect: some preliminary responses.
    Boyle J
    J Med Philos; 1991 Oct; 16(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 11642952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rape protocol.
    Diamond EF
    Linacre Q; 1993 Aug; 60(3):8-19. PubMed ID: 11652906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.