These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12199556)

  • 1. A transmission utility's experience of applying EMF exposure standards.
    Swanson J
    Health Phys; 2002 Sep; 83(3):417-25. PubMed ID: 12199556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing compliance with power-frequency magnetic-field guidelines.
    Bracken TD
    Health Phys; 2002 Sep; 83(3):409-16. PubMed ID: 12199555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Hygienic assessment of sources of electromagnetic fields using revised and new standards of maximum admissible intensities].
    Aniołczyk H; Mamrot P; Politański P
    Med Pr; 2004; 55(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 15156768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of biological effects, dosimetric models, and exposure assessment related to ELF electric- and magnetic-field guidelines.
    Kavet R; Stuchly MA; Bailey WH; Bracken TD
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Dec; 16(12):1118-38. PubMed ID: 11783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Basic restrictions in EMF exposure guidelines.
    Renew DC; Glover ID
    Health Phys; 2002 Sep; 83(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 12199553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exposure of humans to electromagnetic fields. Standards and regulations.
    Vecchia P
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2007; 43(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 17938457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extrapolation of frequency-dependent ceiling limit values for occupational exposure to magnetic fields between 0 and 1 Hz.
    Goiceanu C; Danulescu R
    Health Phys; 2003 Jun; 84(6):770-3. PubMed ID: 12822587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dealing with uncertainty in formulating occupational and public exposure limits.
    Bailey WH
    Health Phys; 2002 Sep; 83(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 12199554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of important international and national standards for limiting exposure to EMF including the scientific rationale.
    Roy CR; Martin LJ
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 17495666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exposure assessment for power frequency electric and magnetic fields.
    Bracken TD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Apr; 54(4):165-77. PubMed ID: 8480632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exposure guidelines for low-frequency electric and magnetic fields: report from the Brussels workshop.
    Sheppard AR; Kavet R; Renew DC
    Health Phys; 2002 Sep; 83(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 12199546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure assessment of electromagnetic fields near electrosurgical units.
    Wilén J
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2010 Oct; 31(7):513-8. PubMed ID: 20607736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Polish guidelines of 2001 for maximum admissible intensities in high frequency EMF versus European Union recommendations].
    Aniołczyk H
    Med Pr; 2003; 54(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 12924002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electric field induced in the human body by uniform 50 Hz electric or magnetic fields: bibliography analysis and method for conservatively deriving measurable limits.
    Magne I; Deschamps F
    J Radiol Prot; 2016 Sep; 36(3):419-436. PubMed ID: 27340133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [National system of protection against electromagnetic fields 0 Hz-300 GHz in the light of current legal regulations].
    Aniołczyk H
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 16871959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electric emissions from electrical appliances.
    Leitgeb N; Cech R; Schröttner J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 18083998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution.
    Jokela K
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 17495653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numerical dosimetry ELF: accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters, and the implication for quantifying guidelines.
    Bahr A; Bolz T; Hennes C
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 17495652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual monitoring for external radiation at accelerator facilities.
    Tanner RJ; Hager LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 21890527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Biological effects and health risks of electromagnetic fields at levels classified by INCRIP ans admissible among occupationally exposed workers: a study of the Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz].
    Bortkiewicz A; Gadzicka E; Zmyślony M
    Med Pr; 2003; 54(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 14669585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.