289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12200554)
1. Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization.
Jain T; Harlow BL; Hornstein MD
N Engl J Med; 2002 Aug; 347(9):661-6. PubMed ID: 12200554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States.
Jain T; Missmer SA; Hornstein MD
N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(16):1639-45. PubMed ID: 15084696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization.
Reynolds MA; Schieve LA; Peterson HB
N Engl J Med; 2003 Mar; 348(10):958-9; author reply 958-9. PubMed ID: 12621143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective.
Martin JR; Bromer JG; Sakkas D; Patrizio P
Fertil Steril; 2011 Mar; 95(3):964-9. PubMed ID: 20688327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of comprehensive state insurance mandates on in vitro fertilization utilization, embryo transfer practices, and outcomes in the United States.
Peipert BJ; Chung EH; Harris BS; Jain T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 227(1):64.e1-64.e8. PubMed ID: 35283088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization be mandated?
Guzick DS
N Engl J Med; 2002 Aug; 347(9):686-8. PubMed ID: 12200559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the United States.
Jain T; Gupta RS
N Engl J Med; 2007 Jul; 357(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 17634460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.
Henne MB; Bundorf MK
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 17482603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro fertilization availability and utilization in the United States: a study of demographic, social, and economic factors.
Hammoud AO; Gibson M; Stanford J; White G; Carrell DT; Peterson M
Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1630-5. PubMed ID: 18539275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization.
Thurin A; Hausken J; Hillensjö T; Jablonowska B; Pinborg A; Strandell A; Bergh C
N Engl J Med; 2004 Dec; 351(23):2392-402. PubMed ID: 15575055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of competition among fertility centers on pregnancy and high-order multiple gestation rates.
Steiner AZ; Paulson RJ; Hartmann KE
Fertil Steril; 2005 May; 83(5):1429-34. PubMed ID: 15866580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does insurance coverage decrease the risk for multiple births associated with assisted reproductive technology?
Reynolds MA; Schieve LA; Jeng G; Peterson HB
Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 12849794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost of transferring one through five embryos per in vitro fertilization cycle from various payor perspectives.
Little SE; Ratcliffe J; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):593-601. PubMed ID: 16946220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
Dickey RP
Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Publication of the results in all Dutch centers for in vitro fertilization: an important step towards an improvement in the effectiveness of the treatment].
Fauser BC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Dec; 146(49):2335-8. PubMed ID: 12510394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost of assisted reproductive technologies for a health maintenance organization.
Hidlebaugh DA; Thompson IE; Berger MJ
J Reprod Med; 1997 Sep; 42(9):570-4. PubMed ID: 9336753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Insurance mandates, embryo transfer, outcomes--the link is tenuous.
Banks NK; Norian JM; Bundorf MK; Henne MB
Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2776-9. PubMed ID: 20579988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic implications of insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization in the United States. A review.
Omurtag KR; Styer AK; Session D; Toth TL
J Reprod Med; 2009; 54(11-12):661-8. PubMed ID: 20120898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
