These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12201126)

  • 1. Faecal contamination over flood events in a pastoral agricultural stream in New Zealand.
    Nagels JW; Davies-Colley RJ; Donnison AM; Muirhead RW
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):45-52. PubMed ID: 12201126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Faecal bacteria yields in artificial flood events: quantifying in-stream stores.
    Muirhead RW; Davies-Colley RJ; Donnison AM; Nagels JW
    Water Res; 2004 Mar; 38(5):1215-24. PubMed ID: 14975655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stormflow-dominated loads of faecal pollution from an intensively dairy-farmed catchment.
    Davies-Colley R; Nagels J; Lydiard E
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1519-23. PubMed ID: 18520007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling bacterial water quality in streams draining pastoral land.
    Collins R; Rutherford K
    Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(3):700-12. PubMed ID: 14723940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential behaviour of Escherichia coli and Campylobacter spp. in a stream draining dairy pasture.
    Stott R; Davies-Colley R; Nagels J; Donnison A; Ross C; Muirhead R
    J Water Health; 2011 Mar; 9(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 21301115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phosphorus and sediment loss in a catchment with winter forage grazing of cropland by dairy cattle.
    McDowell RW
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(2):575-83. PubMed ID: 16510702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overland flow delivery of faecal bacteria to a headwater pastoral stream.
    Collins R; Elliott S; Adams R
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 15960672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal variability of two contrasting transient pollution events in a pastoral stream.
    Yillia PT; Kreuzinger N; Mwetu KK
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):1053-63. PubMed ID: 20182086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Demonstration of methods to reduce E. coli runoff from dairy manure application sites.
    Meals DW; Braun DC
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1088-100. PubMed ID: 16738394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using spatial-stream-network models and long-term data to understand and predict dynamics of faecal contamination in a mixed land-use catchment.
    Neill AJ; Tetzlaff D; Strachan NJC; Hough RL; Avery LM; Watson H; Soulsby C
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jan; 612():840-852. PubMed ID: 28881307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A model framework to assess the effect of dairy farms and wild fowl on microbial water quality during base-flow conditions.
    Muirhead RW; Elliott AH; Monaghan RM
    Water Res; 2011 Apr; 45(9):2863-74. PubMed ID: 21453952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamics of flood water infiltration and ground water recharge in hyperarid desert.
    Dahan O; Tatarsky B; Enzel Y; Kulls C; Seely M; Benito G
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(3):450-61. PubMed ID: 18194313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numbers and transported state of Escherichia coli in runoff direct from fresh cowpats under simulated rainfall.
    Muirhead RW; Collins RP; Bremer PJ
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 42(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 16441369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impacts of land cover on stream hydrology in the West Georgia Piedmont, USA.
    Schoonover JE; Lockaby BG; Helms BS
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(6):2123-31. PubMed ID: 17071881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transfer of Escherichia coli to water from drained and undrained grassland after grazing.
    Oliver DM; Heathwaite L; Haygarth PM; Clegg CD
    J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(3):918-25. PubMed ID: 15843655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numbers of fecal streptococci and Escherichia coli in fresh and dry cattle, horse, and sheep manure.
    Weaver RW; Entry JA; Graves A
    Can J Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 51(10):847-51. PubMed ID: 16333344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Farmyards, an overlooked source for highly contaminated runoff.
    Edwards AC; Kay D; McDonald AT; Francis C; Watkins J; Wilkinson JR; Wyer MD
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jun; 87(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 18179860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Considerations on the influence of extreme events on the phosphorus transport from river catchments to the sea.
    Zessner M; Postolache C; Clement A; Kovacs A; Strauss P
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(11):193-204. PubMed ID: 16114633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbial quality of runoff following land application of cattle manure and swine slurry.
    Thurston-Enriquez JA; Gilley JE; Eghball B
    J Water Health; 2005 Jun; 3(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 16075941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishing relative release kinetics of faecal indicator organisms from different faecal matrices.
    Hodgson CJ; Bulmer N; Chadwick DR; Oliver DM; Heathwaite AL; Fish RD; Winter M
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 49(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19422475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.