217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12201314)
1. Invalidated state regulations violated subjects' rights.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Apr; 15(4):7-8. PubMed ID: 12201314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent for research is related to basic legal rights of all individuals.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Mar; 15(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 12199224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research regulations on subjects' "capacity to give consent" were unconstitutional.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jun; 15(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 11917940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. State regulations on protecting mentally disabled research subjects are ruled invalid.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Oct; 14(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 11658062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond Nuremberg: fifty years later, the debate continues on informed consent.
Barnes PG
ABA J; 1997 Mar; 83():24-7. PubMed ID: 11660466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. State law on human research did not protect subjects' rights: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part I).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 11658037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulating research with vulnerable populations: litigation gone awry.
Oldham JM; Haimowitz S; Delano SJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):154-73. PubMed ID: 15573435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Court said IRB had too much power to make consent decisions for minors.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jul; 15(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 12199227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Uninformed decisionmaking. The case of surrogate research consent.
Haimowitz S; Delano SJ; Oldham JM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(6):9-16. PubMed ID: 9474489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of capacity to give consent to research participation: state-of-the-art and beyond.
DeRenzo EG; Conley RR; Love R
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):66-87. PubMed ID: 15573430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent to human subject research: improving the process of obtaining informed consent from mentally ill persons.
Derrickson D
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 25(1):143-65. PubMed ID: 12173638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulating research with decisionally impaired individuals: are we making progress?
Hoffmann DE; Schwartz J; DeRenzo EG
DePaul J Health Care Law; 2000; 3(3-4):547-608. PubMed ID: 16594106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent of the mentally disabled: a failing fiction.
Chayet NL
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):82-85+. PubMed ID: 11662298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health.
New York. Supreme Court, New York County
N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1995 Feb; 626():1015-24. PubMed ID: 12041120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The ethics of conducting research with older psychiatric patients.
Fitten LJ
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1993 Jan; 8(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11659717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New York State laws on protection of human subjects versus federal regulations: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part III).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Dec; 14(12):7-8. PubMed ID: 11660760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
Sundram CJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Handicapped persons as research subjects.
Bersoff DN
Amicus; 1979; 4(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 11663096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Court says state agency avoided usual way of reporting problems with human subjects: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part II).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 11660763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health.
New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department
N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1996 Dec; 650():173-94. PubMed ID: 12041119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
