These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12202058)

  • 1. Differential sensitivity of children and adults to chemical toxicity. II. Risk and regulation.
    Dourson M; Charnley G; Scheuplein R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Jun; 35(3):448-67. PubMed ID: 12202058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential sensitivity of children and adults to chemical toxicity. I. Biological basis.
    Scheuplein R; Charnley G; Dourson M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Jun; 35(3):429-47. PubMed ID: 12202057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physiological-model-based derivation of the adult and child pharmacokinetic intraspecies uncertainty factors for volatile organic compounds.
    Pelekis M; Gephart LA; Lerman SE
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Feb; 33(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 11259175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Children's health and the environment: public health issues and challenges for risk assessment.
    Landrigan PJ; Kimmel CA; Correa A; Eskenazi B
    Environ Health Perspect; 2004 Feb; 112(2):257-65. PubMed ID: 14754581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in sensitivity of children and adults to chemical toxicity: the NAS panel report.
    Bruckner JV
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Jun; 31(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 10915586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An analysis of the need for an additional uncertainty factor for infants and children.
    Renwick AG; Dorne JL; Walton K
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Jun; 31(3):286-96. PubMed ID: 10915587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data in risk assessment: an international perspective.
    Gundert-Remy U; Sonich-Mullin C;
    Sci Total Environ; 2002 Apr; 288(1-2):3-11. PubMed ID: 12013545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.
    Shipp AM; Gentry PR; Lawrence G; Van Landingham C; Covington T; Clewell HJ; Gribben K; Crump K
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2000 Nov; 16(9-10):335-438. PubMed ID: 11762928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probabilistic framework for the estimation of the adult and child toxicokinetic intraspecies uncertainty factors.
    Pelekis M; Nicolich MJ; Gauthier JS
    Risk Anal; 2003 Dec; 23(6):1239-55. PubMed ID: 14641898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chemicals in the environment and developmental toxicity to children: a public health and policy perspective.
    Goldman LR; Koduru S
    Environ Health Perspect; 2000 Jun; 108 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):443-8. PubMed ID: 10852843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the risks of exposures to multiple chemicals with a common mechanism of toxicity: how to cumulate?
    Wilkinson CF; Christoph GR; Julien E; Kelley JM; Kronenberg J; McCarthy J; Reiss R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Feb; 31(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 10715222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of health risks resulting from early-life exposures: Are current chemical toxicity testing protocols and risk assessment methods adequate?
    Felter SP; Daston GP; Euling SY; Piersma AH; Tassinari MS
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):219-44. PubMed ID: 25687245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The application of non-default uncertainty factors in the U.S. EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Part I: UF(L), UF(S), and "other uncertainty factors".
    Stedeford T; Zhao QJ; Dourson ML; Banasik M; Hsu CH
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2007; 25(3):245-79. PubMed ID: 17763048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chemical warfare agents: estimating oral reference doses.
    Opresko DM; Young RA; Faust RA; Talmage SS; Watson AP; Ross RH; Davidson KA; King J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 1998; 156():1-183. PubMed ID: 9597943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilization of juvenile animal studies to determine the human effects and risks of environmental toxicants during postnatal developmental stages.
    Brent RL
    Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2004 Oct; 71(5):303-20. PubMed ID: 15505806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do current FIFRA testing guidelines protect infants and children? Lead as a case study. Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
    Plunkett LM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Feb; 29(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 10051420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A procedure for developing risk-based reference doses.
    Gaylor DW; Kodell RL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Apr; 35(2 Pt 1):137-41. PubMed ID: 12051999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of pharmaceuticals in cats (Felix sylvestris catus) and implications for the risk assessment of feed additives and contaminants.
    Lautz LS; Jeddi MZ; Girolami F; Nebbia C; Dorne JLCM
    Toxicol Lett; 2021 Mar; 338():114-127. PubMed ID: 33253781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency methods for identification of hazards to developing organisms, Part II: The developmental toxicity testing guideline.
    Claudio L; Bearer CF; Wallinga D
    Am J Ind Med; 1999 Jun; 35(6):554-63. PubMed ID: 10332508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Options for incorporating children's inhaled dose into human health risk assessment.
    Ginsberg G; Foos B; Dzubow RB; Firestone M
    Inhal Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 22(8):627-47. PubMed ID: 20540622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.