These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12203770)

  • 1. Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo imaging.
    Ba-Ssalamah A; Schibany N; Puig S; Herneth AM; Noebauer-Huhmann IM; Trattnig S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Aug; 16(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12203770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Magnetic resonance study of patellofemoral cartilage with a fat-suppressed T1-3D gradient-echo sequence: a comparison with other acquisition technics at medium field strength].
    Cardone G; Minio Paluello GB; Lo Presti G; Gagliardo O; Gallucci M; Castrucci M
    Radiol Med; 1997 Sep; 94(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 9446117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T.
    Palosaari K; Ojala R; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging articular cartilage defects with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo sequence and correlation with histology.
    Trattnig S; Huber M; Breitenseher MJ; Trnka HJ; Rand T; Kaider A; Helbich T; Imhof H; Resnick D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 9448754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
    Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial-spectral spoiled gradient-echo vs. fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging.
    Yoshioka H; Alley M; Steines D; Stevens K; Rubesova E; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 12815641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison between pig lumbar zypapophyseal joint cartilage acquired from multiple magnetic resonance image sequences and gross specimens].
    Liao H; Yu W; Wang W; Liao Y
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 35(10):1064-72. PubMed ID: 21051831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
    Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Isotropic 3-dimensional fast spin echo imaging versus standard 2-dimensional imaging at 3.0 T of the knee: artificial cartilage and meniscal lesions in a porcine model.
    Ristow O; Stehling C; Krug R; Steinbach L; Sabo G; Ambekar A; Huber M; Link TM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 20351518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fat-suppressed 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of the cartilage with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.
    Zheng ZZ; Shan H; Li X
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):W414-9. PubMed ID: 20410387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.
    Han CH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Choi SH; Yun JS; Rho MH
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
    Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
    Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
    Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fat-suppressed 3D-T1-weighted-echo planar imaging: comparison with fat-suppressed 3D-T1-weighted-gradient echo in imaging the cartilage of the knee.
    Karantanas AH; Zibis AH; Kitsoulis P
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2002; 26(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 11918977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and precision in the detection of articular cartilage lesions using magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla in an in vitro study with orthopedic and histopathologic correlation.
    Schaefer FK; Kurz B; Schaefer PJ; Fuerst M; Hedderich J; Graessner J; Schuenke M; Heller H
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Dec; 48(10):1131-7. PubMed ID: 18038353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume.
    Cicuttini F; Forbes A; Asbeutah A; Morris K; Stuckey S
    J Orthop Res; 2000 Jul; 18(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 11052494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
    Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR imaging of knee cartilage with FEMR.
    Vasnawala SS; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG; Gold GE
    Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Oct; 31(10):574-80. PubMed ID: 12324826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.