These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12204042)

  • 1. Newspaper reporting of screening mammography.
    Ray JG
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):373-4. PubMed ID: 12204042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Newspaper reporting of screening mammography.
    Rosen M
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):373-4. PubMed ID: 12204039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Building a health promotion agenda in local newspapers.
    Martinson BE; Hindman DB
    Health Educ Res; 2005 Feb; 20(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 15253997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Summaries for patients. Newspaper reporting about mammography to screen for breast cancer.
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Dec; 135(12):S-63. PubMed ID: 11785470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Newspaper reporting of screening mammography.
    Wells J; Marshall P; Crawley B; Dickersin K
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Dec; 135(12):1029-37. PubMed ID: 11747381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling the dissemination of mammography in the United States.
    Cronin KA; Yu B; Krapcho M; Miglioretti DL; Fay MP; Izmirlian G; Ballard-Barbash R; Geller BM; Feuer EJ
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Aug; 16(6):701-12. PubMed ID: 16049809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Debate among researchers over mammography screening and the potential effect of that debate on screening in the United States.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jan; 100(2):156. PubMed ID: 18182608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
    Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An approach to enhance communication about screening mammography in primary care.
    Nekhlyudov L; Braddock CH
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Sep; 18(9):1403-12. PubMed ID: 19708801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Breast cancer screening is efficient and useful from the age of forty].
    Tristant H
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004; 32(7-8):659-63. PubMed ID: 15450267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stat bite: Frequency of breast cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Nov; 96(22):1657. PubMed ID: 15547177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond standard mammographic screening: mammography at age extremes, ultrasound, and MR imaging.
    Berg WA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):895-906, vii. PubMed ID: 17888776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography screening in women 40 to 49 years old.
    Léger MM; McNellis R;
    JAAPA; 2007 Nov; 20(11):16, 18. PubMed ID: 18035758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection and selection decisions in the practice of screening mammography.
    Stewart TR; Mumpower JL
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2004 Aug; 23(4):908-20. PubMed ID: 15505941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Lisby MD
    Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are there downsides to mammography screening?
    Baines CJ
    Breast J; 2005; 11 Suppl 1():S7-10. PubMed ID: 15725116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in mammography and clinical breast examination: a population-based study.
    Chagpar AB; McMasters KM
    J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 17418862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in abnormal cancer screening results in the United States of America.
    Yabroff KR; Freedman A; Brown ML; Ballard-Barbash R; McNeel T; Taplin S
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 17626704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of an organized, nationwide breast cancer screening programme on non-organized mammography activities.
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Pintér I; Battyány I; Ember I
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 18416949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants of the demand for breast cancer screening among women veterans in the United States.
    Lairson DR; Chan W; Newmark GR
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Oct; 61(7):1608-17. PubMed ID: 16005790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.