530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12205494)
1. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. US reforms rules for telling public about GM food.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2000 May; 405(6783):108. PubMed ID: 10821240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Risks of genetically engineered crops.
Gurian-Sherman D
Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5641):1845; author reply 1845. PubMed ID: 14512604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. GM crop data-agronomy and ecology in tandem.
Stewart CN; Wheaton SK
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 11135511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biotechnology. EPA proposal would exempt some GMOs from registry.
Reardon S
Science; 2011 May; 332(6030):652. PubMed ID: 21551040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. US food-safety body hears protests over genetically modified food.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6762):571. PubMed ID: 10604452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars.
McHughen A; Smyth S
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Jan; 6(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17956539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Controversy over genetically modified organisms: the governing laws and regulations.
Keatley KL
Qual Assur; 2000; 8(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 11710306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. NAS asks for more scrutiny of GM crops.
Stokstad E
Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5560):1619-20. PubMed ID: 11872806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. US sends mixed message in GM debate...as questions emerge over cost-effectiveness.
Reichhardt T
Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6742):298. PubMed ID: 10432097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):807-8. PubMed ID: 11533629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
Hoffman DE
Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Policy: Reboot the debate on genetic engineering.
Kuzma J
Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7593):165-7. PubMed ID: 26961641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Toxicology. Panel urges further study of biotech corn.
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5498):1867. PubMed ID: 11187032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. GM crops: science, politics and communication.
Arntzen CJ; Coghlan A; Johnson B; Peacock J; Rodemeyer M
Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):839-43. PubMed ID: 14526380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
Mandal GN
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. GM food singled out for labeling in the US.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):375. PubMed ID: 10748509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
