530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12205494)
21. GM crops in the cross hairs.
Ferber D
Science; 1999 Nov; 286(5445):1662-6. PubMed ID: 10610557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. GM grass eludes outmoded USDA oversight.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Sep; 29(9):772-3. PubMed ID: 21904303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. GM crops and the pesticide paradigm.
Welsh R; Hubbell B; Ervin DE; Jahn M
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):548-9. PubMed ID: 12042850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. US reflects on flying eye for transgenic crops.
Knight J
Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6954):112. PubMed ID: 12968141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. National academy panel urges USDA to toughen reviews of transgenic plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):323-4. PubMed ID: 11923822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. CGIAR under pressure to support seed treaty.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Feb; 20(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 11821839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Liabilities and economics of transgenic crops.
Smyth S; Khachatourians GG; Phillips PW
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 12042844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
Lusk JL; Rozan A
Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. US courts thwart GM alfalfa and turf grass.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Apr; 25(4):367-8. PubMed ID: 17420729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. 2nd-generation GM traits progress.
Marshall A
Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Apr; 28(4):306. PubMed ID: 20379167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry.
Miller HI
Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Agbiotech. USDA decides against new regulation of GM crops.
Stokstad E
Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6017):523. PubMed ID: 21292947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Regulatory regimes for transgenic crops.
Wilson A; Latham J; Steinbrecher R
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jul; 23(7):785; author reply 787-9. PubMed ID: 16003352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Genetically modified organisms in the United States: implementation, concerns, and public perception.
Oeschger MP; Silva CE
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():57-68. PubMed ID: 17522820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Environmental regulation. U.S. courts say transgenic crops need tighter scrutiny.
Charles D
Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5815):1069. PubMed ID: 17322039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Opinion: EU biotech regulations stall agricultural improvements in developing countries.
Biotechnol J; 2007 Jun; 2(6):670. PubMed ID: 17570700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Courts upbraid USDA for 'lax review' of GM crops.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Nov; 27(11):970. PubMed ID: 19898439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. National politicians block GM progress.
Hodgson J
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):918-9. PubMed ID: 10973199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Redesigning evolution?
Lovins AB
Science; 1999 Sep; 285(5433):1489-91; author reply 1492. PubMed ID: 10498532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Scientists cry foul as Europe plays politics with GM crops.
Hodgson J
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 18259156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
