These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12205496)

  • 1. Criticism preserves the vitality of science.
    Metz M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):867. PubMed ID: 12205496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Where did the scientific method go?
    Noseda M; McLean GR
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 18183010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response to Where did the scientific method go?
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):29. PubMed ID: 18183012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of the impact factor.
    Manske PR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 29(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 15576205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confidential reports may improve peer review.
    Cintas P
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Responsible popular scientific information--what should be required?].
    Terry P; Lindblad J; Larhammar D
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Oct; 97(42):4755-8. PubMed ID: 11079327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Secrecy and openness in peer review--time for a change of culture?
    Goldbeck-Wood S
    Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1999 Nov; 31(8):659-62. PubMed ID: 10730555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disruption to science in developing countries.
    Barcinski MA
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480. PubMed ID: 12774097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistically significant.
    Nat Med; 2005 Jan; 11(1):1. PubMed ID: 15635418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Israeli terms are used for consistency, not politics.
    Freidberg A; Yarom I
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):583. PubMed ID: 12167831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On cloning research, peer review and the possibility of fraud.
    Carrió I
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 16477432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceived journal quality: an indicator of research quality.
    Fahy K; Fenwick J
    Women Birth; 2008 Sep; 21(3):97-8. PubMed ID: 18657498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Criticism with only little inhibitions?].
    Henriksen P
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Sep; 128(18):2087-8; discussion 2088. PubMed ID: 18846128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dangers of advocacy in science.
    Gitzen RA
    Science; 2007 Aug; 317(5839):748. PubMed ID: 17690275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Criticism without inhibitions].
    Aavitsland P
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Jun; 128(12):1377. PubMed ID: 18552894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved accuracy of nutrition information in popular magazines.
    Kava R
    Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 1997 Nov; 14(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 10175267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Editorial: an age of enlightenment or information overload?
    Davis TR
    J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 15542210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pressure also leads to worthless publications.
    de Carvalho LB
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality in epidemiological research: should we be submitting papers before we have the results and submitting more hypothesis-generating research?
    Lawlor DA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 36(5):940-3. PubMed ID: 17875575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.