These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12206034)
1. Evaluation of influenza virus detection by direct enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and conventional methods in asthmatic patients. Khanna M; Kumar P; Chugh L; Prasad AK; Chhabra SK J Commun Dis; 2001 Sep; 33(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 12206034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of clinical specimens for influenza A virus positivity using various diagnostic methods. Varecková E; Blaskovicová H; Gocník M; Mikas J; Adamcáková J; Fislová T; Kostolanský F; Mucha V Acta Virol; 2006; 50(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 17131937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of Directigen flu A+B enzyme immunoassay and direct fluorescent assay for detection of influenza infection during the 2004-2005 season. Rahman M; Kieke BA; Vandermause MF; Mitchell PD; Greenlee RT; Belongia EA Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2007 Aug; 58(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 17509800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid diagnostic methods for influenza virus in clinical specimens: a comparative study. Evans AS; Olson B Yale J Biol Med; 1982; 55(5-6):391-403. PubMed ID: 6763813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influenza virological surveillance in children: the use of the QuickVue rapid diagnostic test. Pregliasco F; Puzelli S; Mensi C; Anselmi G; Marinello R; Tanzi ML; Affinito C; Zambon MC; Donatelli I; J Med Virol; 2004 Jun; 73(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 15122803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Rapid diagnosis of influenza by EIA]. Mitamura K Nihon Rinsho; 2000 Nov; 58(11):2229-33. PubMed ID: 11225309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct detection of influenza virus antigen in nasopharyngeal specimens by direct enzyme immunoassay in comparison with quantitating virus shedding. Döller G; Schuy W; Tjhen KY; Stekeler B; Gerth HJ J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Apr; 30(4):866-9. PubMed ID: 1572972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparative studies on the detection of antibodies to influenza virus antigen using enzyme immunoassay and counterimmunoelectrophoresis]. Pohl WD; Tischner H Z Erkr Atmungsorgane; 1984; 163(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 6390994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analytical sensitivities of six rapid influenza A antigen detection test kits for detection of influenza A subtypes H1N1, H3N2 and H5N1. Chan KH; Lam SY; Puthavathana P; Nguyen TD; Long HT; Pang CM; Chan KM; Cheung CY; Seto WH; Peiris JS J Clin Virol; 2007 Feb; 38(2):169-71. PubMed ID: 17194622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rapid molecular detection of influenza outbreaks in nursing homes. Gooskens J; Swaan CM; Claas EC; Kroes AC J Clin Virol; 2008 Jan; 41(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18065263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance characteristics of a rapid immunochromatographic assay for detection of influenza virus in children during the 2003 to 2004 influenza season. Cruz AT; Cazacu AC; McBride LJ; Greer JM; Demmler GJ Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Mar; 47(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 16492491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical performance of the 3M Rapid Detection Flu A+B Test compared to R-Mix culture, DFA and BinaxNOW Influenza A&B Test. Ginocchio CC; Lotlikar M; Falk L; Arora S; Kowerska M; Bornfreund M; Manji R J Clin Virol; 2009 Jun; 45(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 19409840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of human influenza virus in Yucatan, Mexico. Ayora-Talavera G; Góngora-Biachi RA; López-Martínez I; Moguel-Rodríguez W; Pérez-Carrillo H; Vázquez-Zapata V; Bastarrachea-Vázquez D; Canto-Cab A Rev Invest Clin; 2002; 54(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 12587415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of diagnostic test performance in a population of high risk young adults versus a general population presenting with influenza. Scheuller HS; Lott L; Haas R; Tavish M; Danaher P J Clin Virol; 2015 Jul; 68():49-52. PubMed ID: 26071335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of influenza B in clinical specimens: comparison of high throughput RT-PCR and culture confirmation. Cheng SM; Vainionpaa R; Zhao P; Li F; Hu A; Forrest B; Rappaport R Virus Res; 2004 Jul; 103(1-2):85-90. PubMed ID: 15163494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applications of a duplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and direct immunofluorescence assay in comparison with virus isolation for detection of influenza A and B. Carraro E; Neto DF; Benfica D; SittaPerosa AH; Granato CF; Bellei NC Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2007 Jan; 57(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 17178296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of Binax NOW Flu A and B and direct fluorescent assay in comparison with a composite of viral culture or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for detection of influenza infection during the 2006 to 2007 season. Rahman M; Vandermause MF; Kieke BA; Belongia EA Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2008 Oct; 62(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 18060723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of R-Mix shell vials for the diagnosis of viral respiratory tract infections. Weinberg A; Brewster L; Clark J; Simoes E; J Clin Virol; 2004 May; 30(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15072762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laboratory diagnosis of influenza--virology or serology? Allwinn R; Preiser W; Rabenau H; Buxbaum S; Stürmer M; Doerr HW Med Microbiol Immunol; 2002 Dec; 191(3-4):157-60. PubMed ID: 12458351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]