These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12206524)

  • 1. Fracture mechanics analysis of the dentine-luting cement interface.
    Ryan AK; Mitchell CA; Orr JF
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2002; 216(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 12206524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of dentine depth on the fracture toughness of dentine-composite adhesive interfaces.
    Tam LE; Yim D
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):339-46. PubMed ID: 9175366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of luting cement and thermomechanical loading on retention of glass fibre posts in root canals.
    Li XJ; Zhao SJ; Niu LN; Tay FR; Jiao K; Gao Y; Chen JH
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 24200871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture toughness of resin-based luting cements.
    Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; Seghi R; Berlin JS; Lee JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 10668033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements.
    Mitchell CA; Douglas WH; Cheng YS
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jan; 15(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 10483390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth.
    Terata R; Nakashima K; Kubota M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 11763933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture toughness ov conventional or photopolymerized glass ionomer/dentin interfaces.
    Tam LE; Dev S; Pilliar RM
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(4):144-50. PubMed ID: 8700782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of temporary cement contamination on the surface free energy and dentine bond strength of self-adhesive cements.
    Takimoto M; Ishii R; Iino M; Shimizu Y; Tsujimoto A; Takamizawa T; Ando S; Miyazaki M
    J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 22133591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative evaluation of dental luting cements by fracture toughness tests and fractography.
    Ryan AK; Orr JF; Mitchell CA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2001; 215(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 11323987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations.
    Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 20334906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate on bond strength of a glass-fibre post luted with resin or glass-ionomer based cement.
    de Araújo DF; Chaves LP; Bim O; Pimentel Garcia FC; Ishikiriama SK; Honório HM; Wang L
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 24613604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the fracture resistance of reattached incisor tooth fragments using 4 different materials.
    Singhal R; Pathak A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 23514683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bond durability of self-adhesive composite cements to dentine.
    Suyama Y; de Munck J; Cardoso MV; Yamada T; Van Meerbeek B
    J Dent; 2013 Oct; 41(10):908-17. PubMed ID: 23907082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture toughness of dentin/resin-composite adhesive interfaces.
    Tam LE; Pilliar RM
    J Dent Res; 1993 May; 72(5):953-9. PubMed ID: 8501294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bond strength and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Pereira PN; Yamada T; Tei R; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9545887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.