These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12206589)

  • 1. Detection of marginal defects of composite restorations with conventional and digital radiographs.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Hellmich M; Noack MJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2002 Aug; 110(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 12206589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Noack MJ
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 11385199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
    Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic detection of overhangs formed by resin composite luting agents.
    O'Rourke B; Walls AW; Wassell RW
    J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):353-7. PubMed ID: 8530726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of bonding agents on the decision to replace composite restorations.
    Pamir T; Kaya AD; Baksi BG; Sen BH; Boyacioglu H
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):572-8. PubMed ID: 20945749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Geraets WG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10202472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of composite resin restorations and lining on radiographic diagnosis and decision-making: an in vitro investigation.
    de Araujo RG; Monteiro GQ; Pontual Ados A; Pedrosa RF; Pontual ML; da Silveira MM
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):111-9; quiz 120-1. PubMed ID: 22414504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
    Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Nair M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan; 85(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 9474625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A radiographic and scanning electron microscopic study of approximal margins of Class II resin composite restorations placed in vivo.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Feilzer AJ; Smale I
    J Dent; 1998 May; 26(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 9611937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; Da Silveira PF; Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25311793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.