212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12208578)
1. Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report.
Stroom JC; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2002 Jul; 64(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 12208578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.
Stroom JC; de Boer HC; Huizenga H; Visser AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Mar; 43(4):905-19. PubMed ID: 10098447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1967-90. PubMed ID: 17374922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy.
van Herk M; Remeijer P; Rasch C; Lebesque JV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jul; 47(4):1121-35. PubMed ID: 10863086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Limitations of the planning organ at risk volume (PRV) concept.
Stroom JC; Heijmen BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Sep; 66(1):279-86. PubMed ID: 16904527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Loss of local control due to tumor displacement as a function of margin size, dose-response slope, and number of fractions.
Selvaraj J; Uzan J; Baker C; Nahum A
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041715. PubMed ID: 23556885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined recipe for clinical target volume and planning target volume margins.
Stroom J; Gilhuijs K; Vieira S; Chen W; Salguero J; Moser E; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(3):708-14. PubMed ID: 24113058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The width of margins in radiotherapy treatment plans.
McKenzie AL; van Herk M; Mijnheer B
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Nov; 45(11):3331-42. PubMed ID: 11098907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coping with interfraction time trends in tumor setup.
Giżyńska MK; Kukołowicz PF; Heijmen BJM
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):331-341. PubMed ID: 31721232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PTV margin determination in conformal SRT of intracranial lesions.
Parker BC; Shiu AS; Maor MH; Lang FF; Liu HH; White RA; Antolak JA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(3):176-89. PubMed ID: 12132939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A numerical simulation of organ motion and daily setup uncertainties: implications for radiation therapy.
Killoran JH; Kooy HM; Gladstone DJ; Welte FJ; Beard CJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(1):213-21. PubMed ID: 9054898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image-guided radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients: geometrical uncertainty of the heart.
Topolnjak R; Borst GR; Nijkamp J; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(4):e647-55. PubMed ID: 22270162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of robustness of institutional applied clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in cervical cancer using biological models.
Savanović M; Štrbac B
Med Dosim; 2021 Spring; 46(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 32873469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An assessment of action levels in imaging strategies in head and neck cancer using TomoTherapy. Are our margins adequate in the absence of image guidance?
Houghton F; Benson RJ; Tudor GS; Fairfoul J; Gemmill J; Dean JC; Routsis DS; Jefferies SJ; Burnet NG
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Nov; 21(9):720-7. PubMed ID: 19740637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional dosimetric evaluation of a conventional radiotherapy technique for treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Choi PH; Cheung KY; Lee WY
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Feb; 58(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 11166865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) frame.
Das S; Isiah R; Rajesh B; Ravindran BP; Singh RR; Backianathan S; Subhashini J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 12(2):3260. PubMed ID: 21587166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Planning target volume margin evaluation and critical structure sparing for rectal cancer patients treated prone on a bellyboard.
Cranmer-Sargison G; Kundapur V; Park-Somers E; Andreas J; Vachhrajani H; Sidhu NP
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2013 Mar; 25(3):e17-22. PubMed ID: 22925598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.
Yang J; Mageras GS; Spirou SV; Jackson A; Yorke E; Ling CC; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2567-79. PubMed ID: 16193787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
