These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1220966)

  • 1. The use of same or different sensory modalities for information and instructions.
    Hammerton M
    Ergonomics; 1975 Nov; 18(6):683-6. PubMed ID: 1220966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian networks and information theory for audio-visual perception modeling.
    Besson P; Richiardi J; Bourdin C; Bringoux L; Mestre DR; Vercher JL
    Biol Cybern; 2010 Sep; 103(3):213-26. PubMed ID: 20502912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus uncertainty and perceptual learning: similar principles govern auditory and visual learning.
    Nahum M; Nelken I; Ahissar M
    Vision Res; 2010 Feb; 50(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19761787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of stimulus complexity and sensory modality on reaction time in normal and retarded readers.
    Blank M; Berenzweig SS; Bridger SH
    Child Dev; 1975 Mar; 46(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 1132266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The costs of crossing paths and switching tasks between audition and vision.
    Murray MM; De Santis L; Thut G; Wylie GR
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Feb; 69(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 18571299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unconscious auditory information can prime visual word processing: a process-dissociation procedure study.
    Lamy D; Mudrik L; Deouell LY
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Sep; 17(3):688-98. PubMed ID: 18086535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory versus visual processing of three sets of simultaneous digit pairs.
    Rollins HA; Schurman DL; Evans MJ; Knoph K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Mar; 104(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 1141829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consistency of information processing on visual and auditory, prothetic and metathetic tasks.
    Woodward DL; Driscoll JM; Loeb M
    Ergonomics; 1976 Mar; 19(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 1278140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Memory in a bisensory selective attention task.
    Hall R; Swane D
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 Aug; 25(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 4807291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual and decisional contributions to audiovisual interactions in the perception of apparent motion: a signal detection study.
    Sanabria D; Spence C; Soto-Faraco S
    Cognition; 2007 Feb; 102(2):299-310. PubMed ID: 16480972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults.
    Droit-Volet S; Meck WH; Penney TB
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 17084041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lexicality and modality effects on evoked potentials in a memory-scanning task.
    Pratt H; Erez A; Geva AB
    Brain Lang; 1994 Apr; 46(3):353-67. PubMed ID: 8193910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The co-occurrence of multisensory competition and facilitation.
    Sinnett S; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 18207117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of visual and auditory tracking of a sinusoidal signal.
    Romashkin-Timanov VI; Berezhnaya EK
    Hum Physiol; 1979; 5(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 527996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A case of impaired auditory and visual speech prosody perception after right hemisphere damage.
    Nicholson KG; Baum S; Cuddy LL; Munhall KG
    Neurocase; 2002; 8(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 12221144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.
    Duncan J; Martens S; Ward R
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):808-10. PubMed ID: 9194561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of visual, auditory, and cutaneous tracking displays when divided attention is required to a cross-adaptive loading task.
    Schori TR
    Ergonomics; 1973 Mar; 16(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 4726649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation tool for psychomotor performance during visual motor task: an application of information theory.
    Thullier F; Lepelley MC; Lestienne FG
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Jun; 171(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 18433877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Like and cross modality recognition in retardates.
    Hinshaw EM; Heal LW
    Am J Ment Defic; 1968 May; 72(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 5654102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.