101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12209891)
1. An investigation of the cytotoxicity and histocompatibility of in situ forming lactic acid based orthopedic biomaterials.
Burdick JA; Padera RF; Huang JV; Anseth KS
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 12209891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biocompatibility and safety evaluation of a ricinoleic acid-based poly(ester-anhydride) copolymer after implantation in rats.
Vaisman B; Motiei M; Nyska A; Domb AJ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Feb; 92(2):419-31. PubMed ID: 19191319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Kim SS; Sun Park M; Jeon O; Yong Choi C; Kim BS
Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(8):1399-409. PubMed ID: 16169074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo biodegradability and biocompatibility evaluation of novel alanine ester based polyphosphazenes in a rat model.
Sethuraman S; Nair LS; El-Amin S; Farrar R; Nguyen MT; Singh A; Allcock HR; Greish YE; Brown PW; Laurencin CT
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Jun; 77(4):679-87. PubMed ID: 16514601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microcellular polyHIPE polymer supports osteoblast growth and bone formation in vitro.
Akay G; Birch MA; Bokhari MA
Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(18):3991-4000. PubMed ID: 15046889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of scaffold degradation rate on three-dimensional cell growth and angiogenesis.
Sung HJ; Meredith C; Johnson C; Galis ZS
Biomaterials; 2004 Nov; 25(26):5735-42. PubMed ID: 15147819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional, bioactive, biodegradable, polymer-bioactive glass composite scaffolds with improved mechanical properties support collagen synthesis and mineralization of human osteoblast-like cells in vitro.
Lu HH; El-Amin SF; Scott KD; Laurencin CT
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Mar; 64(3):465-74. PubMed ID: 12579560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of molecular mobility of polymeric implants on soft tissue reactions: an in vivo study in rats.
Andersson M; Suska F; Johansson A; Berglin M; Emanuelsson L; Elwing H; Thomsen P
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Mar; 84(3):652-60. PubMed ID: 17635028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tissue reaction to matrices of reconstituted keratin polymer implanted subcutaneously in sheep.
Peplow PV; Dias GJ; Teixeira F; Kelly RJ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Apr; 89(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 18465821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hydrophobicity as a design criterion for polymer scaffolds in bone tissue engineering.
Jansen EJ; Sladek RE; Bahar H; Yaffe A; Gijbels MJ; Kuijer R; Bulstra SK; Guldemond NA; Binderman I; Koole LH
Biomaterials; 2005 Jul; 26(21):4423-31. PubMed ID: 15701371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancement of ectopic bone formation by bone morphogenetic protein-2 released from a heparin-conjugated poly(L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffold.
Jeon O; Song SJ; Kang SW; Putnam AJ; Kim BS
Biomaterials; 2007 Jun; 28(17):2763-71. PubMed ID: 17350678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In situ forming lactic acid based orthopaedic biomaterials: influence of oligomer chemistry on osteoblast attachment and function.
Burdick JA; Mason MN; Anseth KS
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2001; 12(11):1253-65. PubMed ID: 11853390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oxysterols enhance osteoblast differentiation in vitro and bone healing in vivo.
Aghaloo TL; Amantea CM; Cowan CM; Richardson JA; Wu BM; Parhami F; Tetradis S
J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1488-97. PubMed ID: 17568450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical properties and in vitro biocompatibility of porous zein scaffolds.
Gong S; Wang H; Sun Q; Xue ST; Wang JY
Biomaterials; 2006 Jul; 27(20):3793-9. PubMed ID: 16527348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Novel hydroxyapatite/chitosan bilayered scaffold for osteochondral tissue-engineering applications: Scaffold design and its performance when seeded with goat bone marrow stromal cells.
Oliveira JM; Rodrigues MT; Silva SS; Malafaya PB; Gomes ME; Viegas CA; Dias IR; Azevedo JT; Mano JF; Reis RL
Biomaterials; 2006 Dec; 27(36):6123-37. PubMed ID: 16945410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vivo study of the host tissue response to subcutaneous implantation of PLGA- and/or porcine small intestinal submucosa-based scaffolds.
Kim MS; Ahn HH; Shin YN; Cho MH; Khang G; Lee HB
Biomaterials; 2007 Dec; 28(34):5137-43. PubMed ID: 17764737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo evaluation of a novel electrically conductive polypyrrole/poly(D,L-lactide) composite and polypyrrole-coated poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) membranes.
Wang Z; Roberge C; Dao LH; Wan Y; Shi G; Rouabhia M; Guidoin R; Zhang Z
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jul; 70(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 15174106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of chitosan/poly(lactic acid-glycolic acid) sintered microsphere scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Jiang T; Abdel-Fattah WI; Laurencin CT
Biomaterials; 2006 Oct; 27(28):4894-903. PubMed ID: 16762408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fabrication and in vitro degradation of porous fumarate-based polymer/alumoxane nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Mistry AS; Cheng SH; Yeh T; Christenson E; Jansen JA; Mikos AG
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Apr; 89(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 18428800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fabrication of degradable polymer scaffolds to direct the integration and differentiation of retinal progenitors.
Lavik EB; Klassen H; Warfvinge K; Langer R; Young MJ
Biomaterials; 2005 Jun; 26(16):3187-96. PubMed ID: 15603813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]