BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12210625)

  • 1. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression.
    Heinze G; Schemper M
    Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(16):2409-19. PubMed ID: 12210625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A solution to the problem of monotone likelihood in Cox regression.
    Heinze G; Schemper M
    Biometrics; 2001 Mar; 57(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 11252585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Avoiding infinite estimates of time-dependent effects in small-sample survival studies.
    Heinze G; Dunkler D
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6455-69. PubMed ID: 18816502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias-reduced and separation-proof conditional logistic regression with small or sparse data sets.
    Heinze G; Puhr R
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):770-7. PubMed ID: 20213709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On estimation for accelerated failure time models with small or rare event survival data.
    Alam TF; Rahman MS; Bari W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):169. PubMed ID: 35689190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Firth adjusted score function for monotone likelihood in the mixture cure fraction model.
    Almeida FM; Colosimo EA; Mayrink VD
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2021 Jan; 27(1):131-155. PubMed ID: 33184683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data.
    Heinze G
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4216-26. PubMed ID: 16955543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confidence intervals after multiple imputation: combining profile likelihood information from logistic regressions.
    Heinze G; Ploner M; Beyea J
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(29):5062-76. PubMed ID: 23873477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of Firth-and logF-type penalized methods in risk prediction for small or sparse binary data.
    Rahman MS; Sultana M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):33. PubMed ID: 28231767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence intervals for multinomial logistic regression in sparse data.
    Bull SB; Lewinger JP; Lee SS
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):903-18. PubMed ID: 16489602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modified score function for monotone likelihood in the semiparametric mixture cure model.
    Almeida FM; Colosimo EA; Mayrink VD
    Biom J; 2022 Mar; 64(3):635-654. PubMed ID: 34845768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Penalized maximum likelihood inference under the mixture cure model in sparse data.
    Xu C; Bull SB
    Stat Med; 2023 Jun; 42(13):2134-2161. PubMed ID: 36964996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias reduction and a solution for separation of logistic regression with missing covariates.
    Maiti T; Pradhan V
    Biometrics; 2009 Dec; 65(4):1262-9. PubMed ID: 19432786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fixing the nonconvergence bug in logistic regression with SPLUS and SAS.
    Heinze G; Ploner M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2003 Jun; 71(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 12758140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information criteria for Firth's penalized partial likelihood approach in Cox regression models.
    Nagashima K; Sato Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(21):3422-3436. PubMed ID: 28608396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferential tools in penalized logistic regression for small and sparse data: A comparative study.
    Siino M; Fasola S; Muggeo VM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1365-1375. PubMed ID: 27510370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bring More Data!-A Good Advice? Removing Separation in Logistic Regression by Increasing Sample Size.
    Šinkovec H; Geroldinger A; Heinze G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(23):. PubMed ID: 31766753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias reduction in logistic dose-response models.
    Wagler A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 21442516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Profile-likelihood Confidence Intervals in Item Response Theory Models.
    Chalmers RP; Pek J; Liu Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(5):533-550. PubMed ID: 28594582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Solution to Separation and Multicollinearity in Multiple Logistic Regression.
    Shen J; Gao S
    J Data Sci; 2008 Oct; 6(4):515-531. PubMed ID: 20376286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.