345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12211028)
21. Multiple structural transitions of the GroEL subunit are sensitive to intermolecular interactions with cochaperonin and refolding polypeptide.
Yoshimi T; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
J Biochem; 2006 Mar; 139(3):407-19. PubMed ID: 16567406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Asymmetry, commitment and inhibition in the GroE ATPase cycle impose alternating functions on the two GroEL rings.
Kad NM; Ranson NA; Cliff MJ; Clarke AR
J Mol Biol; 1998 Apr; 278(1):267-78. PubMed ID: 9571049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Conformational changes in the GroEL oligomer during the functional cycle.
Llorca O; Marco S; Carrascosa JL; Valpuesta JM
J Struct Biol; 1997 Feb; 118(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 9087913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Nucleotide-induced transition of GroEL from the high-affinity to the low-affinity state for a target protein: effects of ATP and ADP on the GroEL-affected refolding of alpha-lactalbumin.
Makio T; Takasu-Ishikawa E; Kuwajima K
J Mol Biol; 2001 Sep; 312(3):555-67. PubMed ID: 11563916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. NMR analysis of a 900K GroEL GroES complex.
Fiaux J; Bertelsen EB; Horwich AL; Wüthrich K
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):207-11. PubMed ID: 12110894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Characterisation of a GroEL single-ring mutant that supports growth of Escherichia coli and has GroES-dependent ATPase activity.
Kovács E; Sun Z; Liu H; Scott DJ; Karsisiotis AI; Clarke AR; Burston SG; Lund PA
J Mol Biol; 2010 Mar; 396(5):1271-83. PubMed ID: 20006619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Tandem mass spectrometry of intact GroEL-substrate complexes reveals substrate-specific conformational changes in the trans ring.
van Duijn E; Simmons DA; van den Heuvel RH; Bakkes PJ; van Heerikhuizen H; Heeren RM; Robinson CV; van der Vies SM; Heck AJ
J Am Chem Soc; 2006 Apr; 128(14):4694-702. PubMed ID: 16594706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction of the structure of GroES and its interaction with GroEL.
Valencia A; Hubbard TJ; Muga A; Bañuelos S; Llorca O; Carrascosa JL; Valpuesta JM
Proteins; 1995 Jul; 22(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 7479694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transient kinetic analysis of adenosine 5'-triphosphate binding-induced conformational changes in the allosteric chaperonin GroEL.
Yifrach O; Horovitz A
Biochemistry; 1998 May; 37(20):7083-8. PubMed ID: 9585518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Phosphofructokinase interacts with molecular chaperonins GroEL and GroES.
Melegh B; Minami Y
Acta Biol Hung; 1997; 48(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 9847453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A dynamic model for the allosteric mechanism of GroEL.
Ma J; Sigler PB; Xu Z; Karplus M
J Mol Biol; 2000 Sep; 302(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 10970735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Identification of a GroES (CPN10)-related sequence motif in the GroEL (CPN60) chaperonins.
Gupta RS
Biochem Mol Biol Int; 1994 Jun; 33(3):591-5. PubMed ID: 7951076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Residue lysine-34 in GroES modulates allosteric transitions in GroEL.
Kovalenko O; Yifrach O; Horovitz A
Biochemistry; 1994 Dec; 33(50):14974-8. PubMed ID: 7999753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the stability of an SR398/GroES chaperonin complex.
Ishino S; Kawata Y; Ikegami T; Matsuzaki K; Hoshino M
J Biochem; 2014 May; 155(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 24563543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Local energetic frustration affects the dependence of green fluorescent protein folding on the chaperonin GroEL.
Bandyopadhyay B; Goldenzweig A; Unger T; Adato O; Fleishman SJ; Unger R; Horovitz A
J Biol Chem; 2017 Dec; 292(50):20583-20591. PubMed ID: 29066625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Crystal structure of the native chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus revealed unexpected asymmetry at the cis-cavity.
Shimamura T; Koike-Takeshita A; Yokoyama K; Masui R; Murai N; Yoshida M; Taguchi H; Iwata S
Structure; 2004 Aug; 12(8):1471-80. PubMed ID: 15296740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dissociation of the GroEL-GroES asymmetric complex is accelerated by increased cooperativity in ATP binding to the GroEL ring distal to GroES.
Fridmann Y; Kafri G; Danziger O; Horovitz A
Biochemistry; 2002 May; 41(18):5938-44. PubMed ID: 11980498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A kinetic analysis of the nucleotide-induced allosteric transitions of GroEL.
Cliff MJ; Kad NM; Hay N; Lund PA; Webb MR; Burston SG; Clarke AR
J Mol Biol; 1999 Oct; 293(3):667-84. PubMed ID: 10543958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. From minichaperone to GroEL 2: importance of avidity of the multisite ring structure.
Chatellier J; Hill F; Fersht AR
J Mol Biol; 2000 Dec; 304(5):883-96. PubMed ID: 11124034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Identification of amino acid residues at nucleotide-binding sites of chaperonin GroEL/GroES and cpn10 by photoaffinity labeling with 2-azido-adenosine 5'-triphosphate.
Bramhall EA; Cross RL; Rospert S; Steede NK; Landry SJ
Eur J Biochem; 1997 Mar; 244(2):627-34. PubMed ID: 9119033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
