These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12211227)

  • 1. Commentary: Systematic reviewers face challenges from varied study designs.
    Altman DG
    BMJ; 2002 Aug; 325(7362):461. PubMed ID: 12211227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Systematic review of the literature--an instrument to capture research results].
    Malmivaara A
    Duodecim; 2002; 118(9):877-9. PubMed ID: 12238165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commentary: The debate on non-inferiority trials: 'when meta-analysis alone is not helpful'.
    Liberati A; D'Amico R
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 39(6):1582-3. PubMed ID: 21113051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limitations of randomized clinical trials in chronic diseases: explanations and recommendations.
    Pincus T
    Adv Mind Body Med; 2002; 18(2):14-21. PubMed ID: 12629874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A meta-regression analysis shows no impact of design characteristics on outcome in trials on tension-type headaches.
    Verhagen AP; de Vet HC; Willemsen S; Stijnen T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 18359608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Designs for efficient clinical trials.
    Simon R
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1989 Jul; 3(7):43-9; discussion 51-3. PubMed ID: 2701811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Korn and Freidlin's misunderstanding of the null hypothesis significance testing procedure.
    Trafimow D; Rice S
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Mar; 11(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 21400377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonparametric statistical tests for single-case systematic and randomized ABAB…AB and alternating treatment intervention designs: new developments, new directions.
    Levin JR; Ferron JM; Kratochwill TR
    J Sch Psychol; 2012 Oct; 50(5):599-624. PubMed ID: 23040759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Separation of health and statistics.
    Church TR
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Apr; 100(7):452-3. PubMed ID: 18364500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpretation and inference in noninferiority randomized controlled trials in drug research.
    Wangge G; Klungel OH; Roes KC; de Boer A; Hoes AW; Knol MJ
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Sep; 88(3):420-3. PubMed ID: 20668448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of experimental treatments compared with standard treatments in non-inferiority trials: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Soonawala D; Middelburg RA; Egger M; Vandenbroucke JP; Dekkers OM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 39(6):1567-81. PubMed ID: 20837637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based reviews and meta-analysis.
    Evans J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 149(5):701-3. PubMed ID: 20399923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.
    de Craen AJ; van Vliet HA; Helmerhorst FM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 15718121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of preservation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials.
    Djulbegovic B; Cantor A; Clarke M
    Account Res; 2003; 10(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 14989285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The delayed-start study in Parkinson disease: can't satisfy everyone.
    Olanow CW; Rascol O
    Neurology; 2010 Apr; 74(14):1149-50. PubMed ID: 20368635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyond.
    Moher D; Altman DG; Schulz KF; Elbourne DR
    CMAJ; 2004 Aug; 171(4):349-50. PubMed ID: 15313995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Checklists are not only for the operating room.
    Connor S
    ANZ J Surg; 2013 Oct; 83(10):704-5. PubMed ID: 24251321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current issues with covariate adjustment in the analysis of data from randomized controlled trials.
    Alemayehu D
    Am J Ther; 2011; 18(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 19797942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.