BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12212678)

  • 1. Mandibular growth following implant restoration: does Wolff's law apply to residual ridge resorption?
    Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Wang IC; Liu PR; Hsu YT; Jeffcoat RL; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Aug; 22(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 12212678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A radiographic evaluation of cervical bone loss associated with immediate and delayed implants placed for fixed restorations in edentulous jaws.
    Schwartz-Arad D; Yaniv Y; Levin L; Kaffe I
    J Periodontol; 2004 May; 75(5):652-7. PubMed ID: 15212346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of fixed and removable implant-stabilised prostheses on posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption.
    Wright PS; Glantz PO; Randow K; Watson RM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Apr; 13(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 11952737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. I. Radiographic analysis.
    Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Nummikoski PV; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
    J Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 68(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 9100194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Støvne S; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 9714956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interposed bone grafts to accommodate endosteal implants for retaining mandibular overdentures. A 1-7 year follow-up study.
    Satow S; Slagter AP; Stoelinga PJ; Habets LL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Oct; 26(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 9327287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures can minimize mandibular bone resorption in edentulous patients: results of a long-term radiologic evaluation.
    Mosnegutu A; Wismeijer D; Geraets W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1378-86. PubMed ID: 26574862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment of edentulism using Astra Tech implants and ball abutments to retain mandibular overdentures.
    Cooper LF; Scurria MS; Lang LA; Guckes AD; Moriarty JD; Felton DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):646-53. PubMed ID: 10531736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The extremely resorbed mandible: a comparative prospective study of 2-year results with 3 treatment strategies.
    Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 15346755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival of various implant-supported prosthesis designs following 36 months of clinical function.
    Rodriguez AM; Orenstein IH; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 11885168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate versus non-immediate implantation for full-arch fixed reconstruction following extraction of all residual teeth: a retrospective comparative study.
    Schwartz-Arad D; Gulayev N; Chaushu G
    J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):923-8. PubMed ID: 10914795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant-supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up of treatment with non-submerged ITI implants.
    Bergkvist G; Sahlholm S; Nilner K; Lindh C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 15142099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 24-year retrospective study of bone growth after implant placement.
    Roberts RA
    J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 15871529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review.
    Batenburg RH; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 9714961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible with a definitive prosthesis supported by an intraorally welded titanium bar.
    Degidi M; Nardi D; Piattelli A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):342-7. PubMed ID: 19492651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
    Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
    J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Case report: the transmandibular implant system.
    Tinsley D; Watson CJ; Russell JL; Hassall DC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2001 Mar; 9(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 11695132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of different transplanted soft tissues on bone resorption around loaded endosseous implants in patients after oral tumor surgery.
    Kovács A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):554-60. PubMed ID: 9714963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.