These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12212860)

  • 21. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of Contralateral Noise on Acoustic Reflex Latency Measures.
    Prabhu P; Divyashree KN; Neeraja R; Akhilandeshwari S
    J Int Adv Otol; 2015 Dec; 11(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 26915157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of stimulus duration on stapedius reflex threshold in electrical stimulation via cochlear implant.
    Stephan K; Welzl-Müller K
    Audiology; 1994; 33(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 8042935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of contralateral stimulation on acoustic reflectance measurements.
    Pichelli TS; Soares JC; Cibin BC; Carvallo RM
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 26248969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of ipsilateral and contralateral low-frequency narrow-band noise on temporary threshold shift in humans.
    Quaranta A; Scaringi A; Fernandez-Vega S; Quaranta N
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(2):164-7. PubMed ID: 12701733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat.
    Rhode WS; Greenberg S
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 May; 71(5):1797-825. PubMed ID: 8064349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Phenomenologic aspects of the acoustic reflex following noise exposure.
    Rodriguez GP; Gerhardt KJ; Hepler EL
    Am J Otol; 1989 Nov; 10(6):468-73. PubMed ID: 2610235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Mott JB; Norton SJ; Neely ST; Warr WB
    Hear Res; 1989 Apr; 38(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 2708165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of occupational noise on pure-tone threshold and distortion product otoacoustic emissions after one workday.
    Müller J; Janssen T
    Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 246(1-2):9-22. PubMed ID: 18848612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Frequency Tuning of the Efferent Effect on Cochlear Gain in Humans.
    Drga V; Plack CJ; Yasin I
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():477-484. PubMed ID: 27080689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech-in-noise intelligibility does not correlate with efferent olivocochlear reflex in humans with normal hearing.
    Wagner W; Frey K; Heppelmann G; Plontke SK; Zenner HP
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jan; 128(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17851961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adversarial relationship between combined medial olivocochlear (MOC) and middle-ear-muscle (MEM) reflexes and alarm-in-noise detection thresholds under negative signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).
    Karunarathne B; Wang T; So RHY; Kam ACS; Meddis R
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():124-128. PubMed ID: 30107299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of contralateral noise on the measurement of auditory threshold.
    Kawase T; Ogura M; Sato T; Kobayashi T; Suzuki Y
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2003 Jul; 200(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 14521255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects.
    Collet L; Kemp DT; Veuillet E; Duclaux R; Moulin A; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1990 Jan; 43(2-3):251-61. PubMed ID: 2312416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acoustic reflexes in the measurement of auditory filters at high levels in normal listeners.
    Rosen S; Baker RJ
    Audiology; 1994; 33(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 8129679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. No Effect of Interstimulus Interval on Acoustic Reflex Thresholds.
    Guest H; Munro KJ; Couth S; Millman RE; Prendergast G; Kluk K; Murray C; Plack C
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519874165. PubMed ID: 31516095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acoustic stapedius reflex function in man revisited.
    Aiken SJ; Andrus JN; Bance M; Phillips DP
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):e38-51. PubMed ID: 23403808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The olivocochlear reflex strength and cochlear sensitivity are independently modulated by auditory cortex microstimulation.
    Dragicevic CD; Aedo C; León A; Bowen M; Jara N; Terreros G; Robles L; Delano PH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 16(2):223-40. PubMed ID: 25663383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Frequency summation observed in the human acoustic reflex.
    Kawase T; Hidaka H; Takasaka T
    Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):37-45. PubMed ID: 9213120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.