211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12212873)
1. Comparison of a computerized anesthesia device with a traditional syringe in preschool children.
Allen KD; Kotil D; Larzelere RE; Hutfless S; Beiraghi S
Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 12212873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Wand vs. traditional injection: a comparison of pain related behaviors.
Gibson RS; Allen K; Hutfless S; Beiraghi S
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 11132503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the pain reaction of children receiving periodontal ligament anesthesia using a computerized device (Wand).
Ran D; Peretz B
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 27(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 12739685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pain behaviour and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerised anaesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe.
Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
Br Dent J; 2008 Jul; 205(1):E2; discussion 30-1. PubMed ID: 18493254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of anesthesia for the maxillary primary anterior segment in pediatric patients: comparison of the P-ASA nerve block using CompuMed delivery system vs traditional supraperiosteal injections.
Klein U; Hunzeker C; Hutfless S; Galloway A
J Dent Child (Chic); 2005; 72(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 16568918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computerized anesthesia delivery system vs. traditional syringe: comparing pain and pain-related behavior in children.
Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 16324138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe.
Ram D; Peretz B
J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 14528773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of a computerized local anesthesia device in pediatric dentistry.
Asarch T; Allen K; Petersen B; Beiraghi S
Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(7):421-4. PubMed ID: 10633514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The wand in pulp therapy: an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block.
Oztaş N; Ulusu T; Bodur H; Doğan C
Quintessence Int; 2005; 36(7-8):559-64. PubMed ID: 15997937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anesthetic efficacy of the anterior middle superior alveolar (AMSA) injection.
Lee S; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M; Weaver J
Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(3):80-9. PubMed ID: 15497297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The wand versus traditional injection for mandibular nerve block in children and adolescents: perceived pain and time of onset.
Palm AM; Kirkegaard U; Poulsen S
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(6):481-4. PubMed ID: 15646908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pain perception and utility: a comparison of the syringe and computerized local injection techniques.
Nicholson JW; Berry TG; Summitt JB; Yuan CH; Witten TM
Gen Dent; 2001; 49(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 12004696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of various modes of computerized delivery of local anesthesia in primary maxillary molars.
Ashkenazi M; Blumer S; Eli I
Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16615373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pain Perception: Computerized versus Traditional Local Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients.
Mittal M; Kumar A; Srivastava D; Sharma P; Sharma S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(5):470-4. PubMed ID: 26551372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pain sensation and injection techniques in maxillary dento-alveolar surgery procedures in children--a comparison between conventional and computerized injection techniques (The Wand).
Jälevik B; Klingberg G
Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 25102717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of anesthetic flow rate delivered by the Wand Local Anesthetic System on pain response to palatal injections.
Primosch RE; Brooks R
Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12074223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Injection pain and postinjection pain of the anterior middle superior alveolar injection administered with the Wand or conventional syringe.
Nusstein J; Lee S; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Jul; 98(1):124-31. PubMed ID: 15243483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of anterior and middle superior alveolar (AMSA) anesthesia using a new injection system: the Wand.
Fukayama H; Yoshikawa F; Kohase H; Umino M; Suzuki N
Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):537-41. PubMed ID: 12946073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of site preparation methods on the pain reported during palatal infiltration using the Wand Local Anesthetic System.
Johnson J; Primosch RE
Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 12967069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
