These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12213147)
21. Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism. Roy PM; Colombet I; Durieux P; Chatellier G; Sors H; Meyer G BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):259. PubMed ID: 16052017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios. Bowden SC; Loring DW J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs. Nofuentes JA; Del Castillo Jde D Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4179-201. PubMed ID: 17357992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical prediction rules in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia demonstrate the usefulness of reporting likelihood ratios in infectious diseases. Bai AD; Showler A; Burry L; Steinberg M; Tomlinson GA; Bell CM; Morris AM Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1393-8. PubMed ID: 27357965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interpreting validity indexes for diagnostic tests: an illustration using the Berg balance test. Riddle DL; Stratford PW Phys Ther; 1999 Oct; 79(10):939-48. PubMed ID: 10499967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The relationships among performance measures in the selection of diagnostic tests. Einstein AJ; Bodian CA; Gil J Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Feb; 121(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 9126035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Diagnostic accuracy]. Simundić AM Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Clinically Meaningful Interpretation of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) II and III Data. Cronin P; Dwamena BA Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):561-572. PubMed ID: 29337091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Epidemiologic programs for computers and calculators. Inferences on odds ratios, relative risks, and risk differences based on standard regression programs. Wallenstein S; Bodian C Am J Epidemiol; 1987 Aug; 126(2):346-55. PubMed ID: 3605061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. How to use and interpret interval likelihood ratios. Sonis J Fam Med; 1999 Jun; 31(6):432-7. PubMed ID: 10367208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The two-step Fagan's nomogram: ad hoc interpretation of a diagnostic test result without calculation. Caraguel CG; Vanderstichel R Evid Based Med; 2013 Aug; 18(4):125-8. PubMed ID: 23468201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Likelihood ratios, sensitivity, and specificity values can be back-calculated when the odds ratios are known. Simel DL; Easter J; Tomlinson G J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):458-60. PubMed ID: 23021858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Risk calculators predict failures of knee and hip arthroplasties: findings from a large health maintenance organization. Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Khatod M; Yue E; Funahashi T; Barber T Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3965-73. PubMed ID: 26324831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The usefulness of the likelihood ratio in the diagnosis of dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Moayyedi P; Axon AT Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Nov; 94(11):3122-5. PubMed ID: 10566701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. p-values should not be used for evaluating the strength of DNA evidence. Kruijver M; Meester R; Slooten K Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():226-231. PubMed ID: 25702879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical examination and non-invasive screening tests in the diagnosis of peripheral artery disease in people with diabetes-related foot ulceration. Vriens B; D'Abate F; Ozdemir BA; Fenner C; Maynard W; Budge J; Carradice D; Hinchliffe RJ Diabet Med; 2018 Jul; 35(7):895-902. PubMed ID: 29633431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of clinical special tests for myelopathy in patients seen for cervical dysfunction. Cook C; Roman M; Stewart KM; Leithe LG; Isaacs R J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2009 Mar; 39(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19252263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis. Fischer JE; Bachmann LM; Jaeschke R Intensive Care Med; 2003 Jul; 29(7):1043-51. PubMed ID: 12734652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Re: "P values, hypothesis tests, and likelihood: implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate". Greenland S Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Jan; 139(1):116-8. PubMed ID: 8296770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]