354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12214262)
1. Accuracy of the Dinamap 1846 XT automated blood pressure monitor.
Beaubien ER; Card CM; Card SE; Biem HJ; Wilson TW
J Hum Hypertens; 2002 Sep; 16(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 12214262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol.
de Greeff A; Reggiori F; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 17303988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy of community-based automated blood pressure machines.
Van Durme DJ; Goldstein M; Pal N; Roetzheim RG; Gonzalez EC
J Fam Pract; 2000 May; 49(5):449-52. PubMed ID: 10836778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the DINAMAP ProCare blood pressure device according to the international protocol in an adult population.
Reinders A; Reggiori F; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 16932038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Profilomat II ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
Mee F; Atkins N; O'Brien E
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):353-61. PubMed ID: 10212377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurements of blood pressure with various techniques in daily practice: uncertainty in diagnosing office hypertension with short-term in-hospital registration of blood pressure.
Braun HJ; Rabouw H; Werner H; van Montfrans GA; de Stigter C; Zwinderman AH
Blood Press Monit; 1999 Apr; 4(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10450115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: a randomized crossover trial.
Heinemann M; Sellick K; Rickard C; Reynolds P; McGrail M
Int J Nurs Pract; 2008 Aug; 14(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 18715391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy assessment of the Tensoval duo control according to the British and European Hypertension Societies' standards.
De Greeff A; Arora J; Hervey S; Liu B; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Apr; 13(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 18347446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the SAA-102 home blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the European Society of Hypertension, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and the British Society of Hypertension.
Zaetta V; Daniele L; Perkovic D; Pratticò F; Barisa M; Perfetti P; Gabrieli A; Buonocore F; Winnicki M
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Dec; 12(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 18004104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of TONOPORT V blood-pressure measuring monitor in adults.
Haensel A; Utech K; Langewitz W
J Hum Hypertens; 2005 Sep; 19(9):745-9. PubMed ID: 15951741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of the Omron HEM 706 portable monitor for home measurement of blood pressure.
Foster C; McKinlay S; Cruickshank JM; Coats AJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1994 Sep; 8(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 7807495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of pulse pressure on the accuracy of wrist blood pressure measurement.
Westhoff TH; Schmidt S; Meissner R; Zidek W; van der Giet M
J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Jun; 23(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 19092843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of A&D UA-85X device for blood pressure measurement.
Bonso E; Ragazzo F; Palatini P
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):339-41. PubMed ID: 19020424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
