These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12214751)

  • 1. Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning?
    Metcalfe J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Sep; 131(3):349-63. PubMed ID: 12214751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning.
    Metcalfe J; Kornell N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Dec; 132(4):530-42. PubMed ID: 14640846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The puzzle of study time allocation for the most challenging items.
    Undorf M; Ackerman R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):2003-2011. PubMed ID: 28337646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-regulated learning in younger and older adults: does aging affect metacognitive control?
    Price J; Hertzog C; Dunlosky J
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 May; 17(3):329-59. PubMed ID: 19866382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of agenda-based and habitual processes on item selection during study.
    Dunlosky J; Ariel R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):899-912. PubMed ID: 21480756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation.
    Son LK; Metcalfe J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jan; 26(1):204-21. PubMed ID: 10682298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation?
    Mazzoni G; Cornoldi C; Marchitelli G
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Mar; 18(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 2319961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework.
    Kornell N; Metcalfe J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):609-22. PubMed ID: 16719670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judgments of learning index relative confidence, not subjective probability.
    Zawadzka K; Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1168-79. PubMed ID: 26111879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sleep can reduce the testing effect: it enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected.
    Bäuml KH; Holterman C; Abel M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1568-81. PubMed ID: 24933697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.
    Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):469-86. PubMed ID: 19883131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The region of proximal learning heuristic and adult age differences in self-regulated learning.
    Price J; Murray RG
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Dec; 27(4):1120-1129. PubMed ID: 22946525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning what to learn: the effects of task experience on strategy shifts in the allocation of study time.
    Ariel R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1697-1711. PubMed ID: 23751010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Studying in the region of proximal learning reduces mind wandering.
    Xu J; Metcalfe J
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):681-95. PubMed ID: 26849889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning multiple lists at the same time in the Hebb repetition effect.
    Saint-Aubin J; Guérard K; Fiset S; Losier MC
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 25730643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metacognitive control: Shifting from habitual to agenda processes on item selection during study in elementary school children.
    Li W; Ji H; Li F; Li P; Zhang Y; Li X
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2016 Dec; 86(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 27739062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward an understanding of students' allocation of study time: why do they decide to mass or space their practice?
    Pyc MA; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jun; 38(4):431-40. PubMed ID: 20516223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pop-out into memory: a retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with the recall of subject-performed tasks.
    Zimmer HD; Helstrup T; Engelkamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 May; 26(3):658-70. PubMed ID: 10855424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeated testing, item selection, and relearning: the benefits of testing outweigh the costs.
    de Jonge M; Tabbers HK
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 23422656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.